Growing Media Interest in UFOs - Is Partial Official Disclosure of UFOs as Classified Antigravity Vehicles Inevitable? by Michael E. Salla, Ph.D 

Excluding the extraterrestrial hypothesis and focusing exclusively on the UFO
sightings themselves may ultimately serve to perpetuate non-disclosure of
extraterrestrial life for several more years. I can easily see how the TR-3B can
one day be unveiled to the world media, and U.S. Government authorities claim
that it has been around for decades, was highly classified, and was what people
were mistaking for UFOs for decades. The Air Force or CIA could claim that they
actually cultivated the UFO issue to hide the truth of these very classified
projects. Hence, it would be claimed that the UFO problem has been solved, and
the idea of extraterrestrial life is still just the conjecture of conspiracy
theorists. James Fox and Leslie Kean current strategy may be opening the door to
such a scenario. In short, it's a very dangerous strategy to exclude discussion
of the extraterrestrial hypothesis given the likelihood that classified
antigravity vehicles have been developed and will be eventually unveiled to the
public and used to explain away decades of UFO reports. Then skeptics like
Michael Shermer will claim that they were correct all along and that
'unidentifieds' were highly classified government aircraft not disclosed to the
public for several decades.
We might need to accept that we are probably in the midst of a well developed
disclosure plan with a clear sequence of orchestrated events, and that the Larry
King Live show is part of the process. The plan likely will take advantage of
the recent Stephenville
UFO sightings and other UFO sightings so as to promote a disclosure scenario
where UFOs are explained away as highly advanced classified antigravity
technology. Indeed, we might consider such a scenario as inevitable, coming
before a more genuine disclosure of extraterrestrial life, since it will do much
to allay public concerns over extraterrestrial motivations and technology. After
all, the government can say that we have our own fleet of advanced antigravity
craft that can replicate the performance of UFOs, so no cause for concern if
extraterrestrial life is found to exist. I believe it inevitable that genuine
disclosure will be preceded by a limited disclosure based on the idea that UFOs
are classified antigravity projects. The secret planners may want to sow this
idea into the mass consciousness for a few years or more before going ahead with
genuine disclosure of extraterrestrial life. So eliminating the extraterrestrial
hypothesis while discussing unexplained sightings plays into the hands of the
shadow government planners.
We need to be a little more sophisticated and not play into the hands of such
shadow government plans. Ed Komarek's latest article, "Exopolitics:
Do We Collaborate," nicely introduces the dilemma faced by the UFO and
exopolitical communities using the metaphor of occupied Europe in WWII when it
comes to the reality of extraterrestrial life. The temptation to dampen down
discussion of extraterrestrial life in order to get mainstream media support of
UFO sightings is very real, and is currently occurring. This must be avoided.
Otherwise, one may facilitate a partial disclosure of UFOs as classified
antigravity vehicles that may delay genuine disclosure of extraterrestrial life
for years to come.
Michael E. Salla, Ph.D Kona, Hawaii www.Exopolitics.Org
|