A DARK FLEET IN BLACK SPACEby Vincent R. White
(Copyright 2009, Vince R. White - All Rights Reserved)
There are curious items even supporting the existence of such fantastic operations. A web site cataloging USAF insignia reveals that the 6512th Test Squadron based at Edwards AFB has an unusual test "OPS" patch insignia, one that shows a plainly disc shape with a trailing streak. Other intriguing test squadron patches depict triangular shaped aircraft. Is this a case of team spirit insignia chewing holes in the secrecy wall? Or is it humor?
Did young U.K. computer hacker, Matthew Bevan, climb through one of those holes in the secrecy wall, when he hacked into Wright-Patterson's database and claimed he found documents on gravity propulsion engines, and received a visit from MI6 intelligence types? The charges were dropped for reasons not fully explained.
Now a new peek into the secret empire is the case of Gary McKinnon, also of the UK, who is facing extradition to the U.S, and if convicted a life in
"supermax ," a concrete coffin nearly identical to sensory deprivation.
His crime is hacking in curiosity into the USSC, and finding a collection of documents that detail a secret space fleet, with ship names that do not match naval ships, and in particular refer to a non-terrestrial officer corps, ship-to- ship transfers, and "off world alien liaison" and other related activities.
If the data that Mr. Mckinnon found is mere honey-covered bait, why the full court press to incarcerate Mr. McKinnon? This observer wonders at the nearly desperate degree that U.S. is pursuing this case. It resembles a reckless attempt to frighten any copycats.
Does this not reflect a level of a fear so deep that the US is willing to risk the exposure of more secrets with all the dangers of inadvertent exposure of some fact regarding the true purview and turf of the "USSC"?
Yes, the USSC, also known as:
The United States Space Command
Why is it that the best leaks from key insiders are even more likely to be rejected or ignored. Is it the quality of the source(s), or the content that they reject?
THREE MORE WHITE CROWS IN A HANGAR:
THE NORTON AFB DEMO
Or
The Skeptics Lot of Liars
Here we have something skeptics love to choke on, something that can't be written off as misidentification or misperception. Several, perhaps up to four individuals, claim to have seen, or known about three differently sized saucer-shaped objects, silently hovering in a hangar at Norton AFB Nov 12, 1988.
These spacecrafts were known as "Alien Reproduction Vehicles" or ARVs.
The multiple witnesses tell similar details involving 3 ARVs, 24, 60, and 120 feet in diameter, being in the inner security area of a large complex of large Quonset type structures.
These eyewitness accounts emerged from two directions, one being the Bill Jenkins radio talk show "Open Mind" witnesses, the other the Disclosure Project witness, Mark McCandlish, an aerospace illustrator--with high security clearances. At the same time as a public air show was going on, a very private demonstration was held.
Mark McCandlish, heard of the showing from his friend Brad Sorenson, who actually toured the exhibit. Mark McCandlish subsequently called the office of his congressman for the demonstration district, the late George Brown Jr., the chairman of the congressional committee for space science and advanced technology, assuming such an effort was coordinated by the AF public affairs office. Incredibly, a staff member confirmed the exhibit, and that there were three discs there. Was a disclosure in the works? Or, was this a lapse in security?
Skeptics have the simple choice of labeling these disclosers as coordinated cooperative liars or taking seriously their reinforcing detailed accounts.
Panels on one of the discs were opened revealing the crew compartment, constructed of a composite material. Brad Sorensen and Kent Sellen's accounts, were similar, the latter having seen the same vehicles at Edwards AFB as a Crew Chief for experimental aircraft. Other details included what appeared to be capacitor plates applying the Biefeld-Brown Effect, possibly separated by Dow Chemicals "G-10" Barium Titanate dielectric.
The surface of these craft was greasy in spots and pitted, indicating both old age and use?
| Click here for Part IV coming February 26, 2009. |
|
UFODIGEST.COM All rights reserved. FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.
|
|