We now see the rules about what gets reported in major aerospace journals.

If it leads to a UFO, or is a UFO, it is taboo territory. Where is recent global UFO activity in the pages of AW&ST or JDW? There is no current UFO activity-in these pages.

What goes on behind closed editorial doors at Aviation Week or Jane's Defense Weekly?

Why are there no articles on the Stephensville, Texas UFO activity (with 10 F-16's on full afterburner chasing these interlopers).

Why no coverage of a UFO hanging in broad daylight over gate C-7 at Chicago's O'Hare concourse, one of the busiest airports in the world?

Why are there no stories on the Black Triangle activity that haunts interstates and a hundred cities. All these events constitute aerial security issues but are not covered at all.

The answers do not appear in current policy pages of any aerospace journals.

Was the Disclosure Project press conference on May 9, 2001 covered in Aviation Week?

It was one the best attended conferences in National Press Club history. It had defense related significance. When over twenty former high-ranking military, intelligence and corporate officials make incredible UFO-related claims that strike at the heart of Aviation Weeks reportorial domain, it is news, isn't it? But all this was silently sidestepped. How and why?

Reporters were handed the equivalent of a thick, large bloody steak.

They had 4-inch thick press packets, and claims and testimonies to inquire into, substantive and definitive claims that they could have taken to an editor and asked to dig into, either to demolish in careful reporter work, disgracing and dismissing the press club event as one of the greatest hoaxes ever or to validate their accounts with reportorial due diligence.

The other possibility must have hung like a black cloud behind closed doors of many an editorial office, where editor after editor must have said:

"Do you realize, what you are asking us to do?

We are taking on the government itself! How can we do that, when our licenses come up for review (?) and hints and messages come from on high and the owners say (?):

"We can't bite the regulatory hands that feed us-we will not do this!"

It is news isn't it, when a retired Lt. Col. John Williams testifies that the U.S. government may have spent more on gravity research than any other single project. Other witnesses spoke of antigravity chambers in use. Still others spoke of operational "Alien Reproduction Vehicles" or ARVs.

One amazing claim after another was made.

The silence of big media is almost as good as an investigative housekeeping stamp of approval that something really bigis being hidden, and this is absolutely real.

Where was Aviation Week's blistering editorial branding these witnesses as a rare collection of lunatics and liars? The silence was mute testimony to an untouchable story.

Why didn't corporations named as participants in gravity control success, cry fowl and threaten legal action over fraudulent claims-or do they quietly seek to creep into the shadows of secrecy on these matters?

Where were the military and intelligence agency legal penalties for spreading fraudulent tales--or do they simply want to avoid publicity at all costs?

The existing public record "does not compute."

Click on the 'NEXT' arrow for page 7

Share this article with:

More articles by Vincent R. White: • A Dark Fleet In Black Space Part III • A Dark Fleet In Black Space Part II • A Dark Fleet In Black Space • Alien UFO Mission - Roswell - Mission Chosen Few • Exploring “The Drone Hoax