The idea of the need of a united front in dealing with off-world groups is a real and viable one, and so is the need – real but not easy to achieve. There are ideas and needs within USG-network circles and ideas and needs within NGOs. Ideas differ according to the side which represents some aspect of USG/network interests, either military or economic.

Ideas in NGO circles also differ according to the definitions given by the specific group, and the vantage points of the NGOs themselves. The need for advanced technology is a given, although circumscribed to developed countries and advanced technology corporate entities. Cost benefit favors those who pay to become recipients of often diluted advanced methods which, still, are more advanced than anything on Earth. The litany of such beneficiaries, while classified by all accounts, is, I’m told, very long and not all of them are American companies.

The other thing to consider in your definition of the problem with ETs is your perception of such as being “fragmented.” Actually, we are the fish and all we see is water. The cognitive means we use to deal with them severely undercut our ability to deal with them: somewhat like using DC-3s to combat people with F-22s. They use a form of topological thinking, which uses a completely different way of structuring thinking architectures such that, as George LoBuono’s experience with transversals and other off-worlders teach us, make human beings less than able to stay the course with them.

We are handicapped by our use of fairly linear thinking styles and by the absence of sufficient neural networks interconnected to allow wide associations, layered considerations of topics, and interconnections between topics. However, all of this can be easily corrected, by using a wider swath of our natural intelligence and all of our brains. Yes, all four of them. More on this later in this commentary.

Here, I want to spend time discussing a short list of imperatives I see we have as human beings, as a biokind, as a civilization, and as a budding galactic member of a (yes, George LoBuono is quite correct) overpopulated galaxy and universe. I am not going to focus on concerns already so ably expressed by George. Instead, I’m going to look at imperatives we must recognize, develop and adopt as working perspectives and utilitarian methods in our dealings with off-worlders.

We, I and my colleagues, have done so, to much profit in gaining a wider, more profound level of grasp and understanding of issues, problems, opportunities and challenges we face with their presence on our planet, the solar system, and their amalgamation into our civilization and society.

FIRST IMPERATIVE
LEARN TO USE TOPOLOGICAL THINKING

From here onward, I quote from an essay I wrote and published on the net some years ago, and from a book in process I am currently writing. (Edit note: Some of the paragraphs were quite long so I broke them up in this treatise from source.)

Since our appearance on the face of the Earth as a sapient biokind (or what Zecharia Sitchin called homo sapiens sapiens), we humans of Earth have been undergoing an evolution of consciousness in spurts of growth, not in a linear fashion. We have been undergoing a kind of evolution in our way of thinking based upon our abilities to become able and comfortable in using our own nervous system with which to manifest these evolving modes of conscious mental and psychophysiological behaviors.

Early on, we deployed a use of our higher mental capabilities in a dualistic fashion: we behaved according to what we could manifest as whole-prehension consciousness (or right-hemispheric thinking) and as emerging intellectual-rational thinking (or left-hemispheric mental behavior). It is this stage that Julian Jaynes referred to as important aspect of bicameral consciousness.

We still do manifest this model of mental behavior in external behaviors that result in fearful conduct, worrying, wars, lack, and more. This is behavior driven by left-hemispheric thinking, intellectually justified and buttressed by the functions and modalities of left-hemispheric thinking modalities and information processing. This is a thinking mode we have come to regard as ego-consciousness, or proprioceptive homo-centered consciousness – a kind of individual and social solipsism.

In other words, left-hemispheric thinking modalities and information processing conceive of the external world as only real through the senses, and that its body consciousness is the boundary to its sense of “reality.” Anything beyond it is not certain to be “real,” unless the left-hemispheric intellectual derivation of what is real is buttressed by some aspect of its information processing of the external event. To a person who thinks in this fashion, UFOs don’t exist unless one lands in front of him or her.

Even a flash appearance of one in the skies that lasts a short while may be explained away or denied, depending upon how the person’s intellectual handling of the information is processed. Extraterrestrial groups on and around near Earth space are aware of the prevalence of this thinking modality in human beings. Therefore, members of these different groups encourage, advance, boost, further, and promote us to develop topological thinking.

Click on the 'NEXT' arrow for page 4

Share this article with:

More Articles of Interest: • Our New Civilization Will Be Based on Torsion Field Technologies • MJ 12 and the Aviary • Is the Aviary a CIA UFO/ET Security and Suppression Network? • A Dark Fleet in Black Space - Part IV • UFO and Paranormal Research in Kentucky Peaks • Christian UFOlogy • Pope's star watcher to visit Nasa and talk aliens • Aliens and Abductions 2008 Year in Review - APRIL • Alleged UFO Sighted Over L.A. • New Jerusalem: Mothership's Holding Pattern? • Peter Fotis Kapnistos' UFO Apology to Stephen Yulish • Scientists Discover their Sixth Sense • Two Blocks from Slab Town - Walk! Do Not Run! • Adventures Of A Ghosthunter • Do humans just disappear Into thin air? • 'Dogged Days' • The Upcoming Great Deception • Zeitgeist: The Spirit of the Age Movie-Refuted