Global warming activists suggest that to deny that mankind isn't responsible for the increase in rising earth temperatures is equal to denying the holocaust . In her column, Ellen Goodman, a Pulitzer Prize winning writer, compares people who have doubts about the global-warming crisis with people who deny the Holocaust.⁸

As more people continue to be educated on the global warming issue, activists of the cause are becoming embittered and are seeking methods to retaliate. One such method they support would be to hold Nuremberg type trials to prosecute those who disagree with them.⁹

Vaclav Klaus, president of the Czech Republic, said in written testimony that global warming has turned into a religion that has replaced the ideology of communism and threatens basic freedoms. Mr. Klaus said the push to curb greenhouse gases would hurt poorer nations that can't afford modern technology. He compares radical environmentalists to Marxists, and says initiatives such as the Kyoto Protocol require enormous costs without any realistic prospect for success.10

Are we being programmed; sold a "bill of goods" concerning earth changes and global warming, and if we are, who is responsible for the propaganda and what is their end game? Can it be as simple as differences between the Democratic and Republican political parties: liberals versus conservatives?

The debate concerning global warming is reaching critical mass. Proponents exaggerate claims and demonize opponents to their theology. They are recruiting the children of the earth as their ambassadors. Their rhetoric spreads disinformation, causes political polarization and is planting the seeds for religious and ideological revolution. Is this a primal revival of some basis instinct inherent in all humans, or is this a fabricated theory orchestrated by an unseen hand for an unknown purpose?

Sources:
1. news.nationalgeographic.com
2. itsgettinghotinhere.org
3. nationalacademies.org
4. nationalgeographic.com
5. huffingtonpost.com
6. 64.233.167.104
7. abduct.com
8. foxnews.com
9. courierpress.com
10. newsmax.com

Your Comments:

March 29, 2007: My name is Nathan Simons; currently I am enrolled at Oakland Community College, in Auburn Hills, Michigan. What brought me to your web site; is that, in my Composition I class we are in the process of writing an essay about the effects of global warming and for the research recently viewed the documentary "Inconvenient Truth." Even going as far as pulling my wife aside and saying to her, "honey! oh my God you're never going to believe this!" So here I sit ready to start my research on who to believe? I happy to report that I turned off the alarm...to quote your article, "There aren't just a few bears, there are a hell of a lot more bears." (good one lol.

Like yourself; I too need unprecedented truth about whatever the topic and appreciate hearing both sides of the issue, before making an informed decision. Like the 2000 election, this would not be the first time Al let me down.

Thank you again for being the voice of reason....
Sincerely
Nathan

March 28, 2007: With all due respect I think you are misinformed on most of what you say. I live in Canada. I own magazines that get reports on the facts about bears in the north. Yes, there are some areas where they are prospering and no, they may not become extinct in our lifetime but I also have seen enough evidence that man has caused damage to the environment that I applaud all children seeing Al Gore's movie. I have five children and they have all seen it, more than one time. I hope everyone in the world sees it. Then perhaps there will be enough energy spent doing something to curb the damage.

Sincerely,
Raymond F. Oelrich
Publisher and President
Big Game Adventures
www.BGAMAG.com