I have taken it upon myself to report on the information conveyed by an active duty naval officer associated with the Military UFO Working Group primarily communicating through UFO/ET investigators Clay and Shawn Pickering. I have done this because I believe his is a very important case that is not getting enough coverage in the UFO/ET community. Clay, Shawn and their source have presented the information through informal discussions on the Open Minds Forum over the past year.
Unless a person is willing to sift through a huge amount of discussion on several OM threads they will have little understanding of this complex case. For this reason I think I can be useful in promoting this case to a larger audience both in the UFO community and for the general public. I think this case is that important! My intention is to report on developments for those who do not have the time or the inclination to spend hundreds of hours sorting through the raw information on the OM threads.
My previous article titled, Obama Not Briefed on UFOs, has stimulated some discussion in the UFO community and amongst Clay and Shawn Pickering and their source. Source A and the Military UFO Working Group are very concerned with the accuracy of the information being presented to the public not wanting to mislead in any way. The Group and Source A are also concerned that our public focus remain with the secret UN-UFO meetings and not get distracted with Source A’s extraterrestrial experiences or with speculations about which presidents have been briefed.
Obviously the UFO Working Group and Source A have their agenda just as we in the public have ours. These agendas might not always mesh but its importance to realize that we and the UFO Working Group are in complete agreement as to the need for disclosure. I think that those of us in the civilian sector and those in the military realize the need for a give and take as we liaison together to collectively work toward disclosure and a general enlightened UFO/ET policy.
Our military friends seem to want to make the point that there are grades of accuracy that range from direct exposure to the facts to pattern recognition to speculation. They want us to understand that it is very important to be able to distinguish between these grades of accuracy. I think this is very important in their line of work because people’s lives are often on the line and dependent on accurate information.
On the other hand we in the public may be more willing to give up some accuracy in trade for just getting the information out into the public domain to promote discussion to facilitate disclosure. Of course there is room for both approaches. I think our military friends intend to keep our feet to the fire in regards to accuracy while at the same time we keep theirs to the fire to disclose as much as possible.
Therefore I included below a couple of conversations as we work on clarifying the accuracy issue in regards to Source A’s testimony. The first is an OM conversation by Clay Pickering and the second is a conversation from Shawn Pickering to me.
|Click on the 'NEXT' arrow for page 2