"Out for profit" is a major detriment to our society.

From Hip-hop artists pushing booze to physicians pushing the "newest" drugs to politicians siding with industrial lobbyists, so what's wrong with UFO Digest doing the same? It's not that we are materialistic society, we have become a very selfish society looking out only for ourselves, despite what you may have read in the popular press, another industrial conglomerate.

This may be as old as capitalism, but it's getting worse all the time. Stay tune.

i sent seth an mail on monday . i have a piece of land close to"the very large array". i sent him the address of my detailed account of a sighting that i had on nov17th 2006- i had posted it on sta- but since have posted it on a site that i mod. at- my sighting is 'THE GALLACTIC TRAIN AND D.U.M.B.'S.- - - seth told me in the e-mail that seti at the very large array didn't hunt for et's and that he had tured down a job there- - - he totial side stepped the issue of d.u.m.b.'s
http://patriotcrossroads.com/viewtopic.php?t=1795&highlight=

I think this site is getting better every day

While I personally don't endorse any of Seth Shostak's beliefs he is entitled to them. We will follow up this article with a review of the book. This is simply a notice to let readers know it is available and as always readers are open to accept or reject, purchase or not anything on UFO Digest. I accept the fact that Shostak is a scientist but he doesn't to ridicule the beliefs or opinions of others.

I'm going out on a limb here but this only really needs to be said once so the others can keep a cool head where I won't. Besides, I have nothing to lose so here goes.

What's next UFO Digest, articles to sell books from Michael Shermer, Bruce Dunning or how about James Oberg?

Seth has an avenue through Nat Geo is all, just the same - Seth wrote it and Seth a known UFO skeptic will profit from it.

No matter how you look at it, the memories of Seth with the boys on Larry King Live, etc.(and there's a lot of ect's) will never fade.

"Whether they've arrived via rocket, flying saucer, or plain old teleportation, they've been invading, infiltrating, or inspiring"

Well, they got the inspiring part right anyway because you know darn well that he could give a hoot about the rest because they only want to sell a book to your viewers and you're a tool.

Had they not thrown in the "Whether they've arrived via rocket, flying saucer, or plain old teleportation, they've been invading, infiltrating", I probably would have said nothing but they did and that's hypocrisy. Nat. Geo. most likely wrote the editorial review, which I saw in Amazon but I'm sure they felt that it was a necessity to put the above quote in for all of those reasons you already know.

In other words UFO Digest, you sold out to unbelievers (and a skeptic) who are out for profit or they're taking a horrible advantage of your website. It's no secret to them that UFOs and alien sites are big hitters. Maybe I should go check BJ's site to see if he succumbed to this antic as well.

"Confessions of an Alien Hunter: A Scientist's Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence"