THE UFO APPERS IS NOT USE AIR PROPULSION SYSTEM; BECAUSE IT IN SPACE WHERE AIR IS VERY VERY VERY SMALL IN DENSITY IF WE COMPARE WITH IT'S DENSITY IN EARTH'S ATMOSPHERE. THE KINDS OF UFO ARE : (A)AIR POWERED UFOs WHICH ARE THE OLDEST KIND," I BELIEVE IN AIR PROPULSION SYSTEM UFO",(B) ELECTROGRAVITIC KIND WHICH USES LIGHT AND VOLTAGE, (C) Plasam PROPULSION UFO AND (D) MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC KIND WHICH IS SEEMS AS A "GLOWING BALLS OF LIGHT"

BUT I BELIEVE IN FIRST ONE ; THE AIR PROPULSION UFO.

YOU CAN SEE MY WEB SITE.

THE PATTERNS APPEARS ON THE DISK MEANS THAT THERE ARE DESIGNERS BECAUSE THE THING IN THE FILTERED PICTURE IS A UFO.

WHEN THE HUMEN BEINGS GO TO SPACE AND LAND ON THE MOON IN 1960S THE HUMAN BEINGS IS INTELLIGENT AT THE SAME TIME THERE ARE UFOs FROM ANOTHER PLANETS EXISTE AND WHEN BE SEEN , THEY INTELLIGENT , CAN MAKE FLUING DISKS , A MOVING CITIES AND A MOVING NATIONS AS IT TRUE TO BE NAMED.

THE MOST OR CORRECTLY THOSE WHOM MAKE NAMES; NAMED THE INTELLIGENT LIFE THAT IN UFOs; A UFO ,IT IS THE FIRST LETTERS OF " UNDEFINED FLYING OBJECT", SO THEY UNDEFINED RELATIVE TO THOSE THAT NAMED THEM BY THIS NAME "UN DEFINED".

I SEE AND SAY LET DO NOT MAKE THE EARTH LOOKS LIKE A "POLICE STATION".AND WE A PRESONERS.

THE UNTOCHED PHOTO THE UFO IN IT LIKE A COIL, THREE BLUE EAGES AND THREE RED ARMS INTO INSIDE "INTO THE CENTER" WHICH IS MORE RED.

I would like to hear from folks out there who have UFO photos and stories to tell. I am putting together a book. If you would like your name to be used please let me know if not tell me and you will remain anonymous. You can find my e-mail by googling MUFON Arizona.
CD

I tried taking photos tonight 04/04/09 in RAW format, but other than creating a really large photo file, I can't see what good it really does. I can take JPG in large files also, but they need to be sized down anyway to e-mail, for for now I will stick to JPG files. Thanks for the tip anyway David.

CD

My hat is off to Christine Dickey, master photos I only wish it was me who took them.
Sounds like the debunkers are mad because it's proof positive of UFO's.

Thank you David B for your input. I have gone to doing my photos in RAW NEF format. Lots to learn with this new Nikon camera. Like going from a VW to a Rolls Royce.

CD

I have been reading the comments and most of them have been encouraging. Please know that I am very much intrested in the truth as well as anyone, always have been. I can't explain how or why I get the images I do, but I do not believe they are artifacts, if they are they are space artifacts, not camera artifacts. I have one of the best cameras out there, a Nikon D 90 with an updated 300mm zoom lens, but I don't think this camera can think for itself and create whatever image it wants. Remember what some of you are saying (David) is that JPG photographs aren't worth a **** and if that is true, then on that basis a lot of cases in court can be thrown out. As long as eye witness testimony and photographs (including digital) can convict a person to prison time or worse, we have to consider the fact that it is credible. You can believe what you want, but you won't change my mind a bit nor discourage me from continuing to take photographs. BTW Jim Dilletoso says Photofiltre is one of the better programs out there.

CD

I found the article very interesting as well as professional in every respect. The most amazing photos giving details rarely seen on the web. After closely examining the photos it seems worthy of praise for quality and clarity. If there were more articles like this Urology would make a giant leap forward in getting to the truth.
MJ

I think it's quite fascinating that Mrs. Dickey has stated that she used Photofiltre to enlarge parts of the image. This is a freeware program that tends to introduce significant artifacts into the rescaling process, unlike the more sophisticated algorithms in Photoshop and some other third-party image processing technology such as Resizer (an After Effects plugin from Digital Anarchy, now out of print). One of the specs missing regarding the image is whether or not it's shot in RAW or JPEG file formats. A JPEG original would introduce significant DCT artifacts into the picture, resulting in the types of visual looks I've seen associated with practically ALL of the pictures presented by Nussbeck.

As Nussbeck seems to be ignoring my public challenge to come forward with a demonstration of his "PPP" approach, I'll assume he's also using Photofiltre to run some edge enhancement or other convolution array, box-filter processing to the image to create the totally unscientific results he's getting. Mrs. Dickey, until you decide to let a qualified image processing expert look at your images, there's simply no reason to think that they're showing UFOs of any sort.

dB

I have resent this article to the University of Arizona to a Dr. Wegryn. Please e-mail him to support his response on this article. sci@wegryn.com.

Appreciate it

Chris

I am going to resubmit this photo to University of Arizona. As soon as I found out that the NEO was nearest the Earth I believe on the 19th of February (if I am not mistaken) I was astounded. I will try and locate someone at the University who will at least take a good look at this. I photographed this object almost due east. Actually I was trying to photograph a bright light going back and forth between the houses out here to the southeast of our house when I got these objects. When I first saw them they looked like grey dots in the middle of the photo. When I enlarged using photofiltre program these are what I got. These have never appeared on any other photos so they are not artifacts of the camera. I hope we get some serious analysis on these. We will keep trying.
CD

I really like the photos, makes me feel like someone is at least keeping an eye on things above us. I am still in college but would like to join MUFON and become an investigator one day. I am going out this weekend and try and snap a few photos myself, maybe a ufo...
Liz

I am a amateur photographer that has used a Nikon D 90 in field photography for many years. The photos shown on this page are consistent with the images produced by my D 90. The description of the camera is right on with little or no doubt it’s a Nikon. How could anyone try and debunk the camera, it sounds almost like the person has an agenda beyond the camera? Actually the photos are particularly good in quality of lens adjustment for a clear image. Good work, pay no attention to the debunker, I like the image and am jealous that I did not take the photo.
Terry Coffman, San Marcos, Ca.

Hey, please when posting your comments:

1. No swearing

2. No personal attacks

Agree, disagree with an article. Think it is brillant or stupid, feel free to express your opinions, but no swearing or personal attacks or I'll simply not approve your comment.

Thanks Dirk

You people seriously need to get a life! This is the stupidest thing I have ever seen and read. There is no way a Nikon D 90 imaged that asteroid.

I will be updating the posts as soon as we hear from University of Arizona. The question remains open as to if the asteroid is really 2009 BD? It seems most likely that it is or NASA would have already commented on this one. Thanks again to Christine Dickey for the wonderful photo.
RN

The asteroid alone should be enough for scientists to study, the size alone must be massive. If in fact it is 2009 BD the 400,000 miles away theory is dubious at best. The UFO trailing the asteroid is very unusually round, not a meteor or and asteroid to my thinking. Ms. Dickey took a great photo that should be praised and I for one hope she continues to take more.
LJ

Thanks. Good reporting!

That is to cool I also would be interested to see what the university of az.and national geograhic would say about it...jimmy

Really a nice photo of the asteroid and the UFO. It must be closer than anyone thought. What did the University of Arizona say about the photo???

Bobby