George Knapp's Nevada sources included Area 51 contractors and others, who after contacts with Knapp began to receive intimidating visits from security personnel. The sources consistently described advanced technology programs derived from crashed saucers. A Nellis AFB radar technician leaker described seeing radar returns of objects accelerating suddenly from a hovering position over Groom Lake to 7,000 mph.

Would real UFOs be treated this way over one of the most sensitive locations in the entire U.S.? Are we seeing the same hands-off policy in Area 51? Skeptics have their "It couldn't be kept secret" leaks-a-plenty; they just won't grapple with them.

Take the complex account of Area 51 deep insider, ex-marine and engineer, Bill Uhouse, who reportedly was given permission to leak limited portions some of what he did as part of an intense back engineering and exchange program. This permission was supposedly part of an insider public acclimation program.

Bill Uhouse's testimony supports Arthur Stancil's first-hand account of a 953 Kingman, Arizona 1 disc-crash retrieval. Corroborating the Kingman crash retrieval incident are multiple sources who tell of strange events that occurred in the Spring of 1953, where specialists were being called into base theatres around the U.S. and shown a short movie of what may have been the actual Kingman Arizona crash retrieval.

Those facts correspond with Bill Uhouse's lengthy, highly detailed description of the transport of "The Kingman Saucer," and of building flight simulators for back engineered (eventually developed) "home-grown flying saucers," which Uhouse asserts were operational by the 70's.

Significantly, Bill Uhouse affirms the existence of the quasi public-private entity of Steven Greer's Disclosure Project running the technology effort, but he labels it a "satellite government." Skeptics bemoan, charging "fantasy and coincidence". Empiricists continue to add up the ever-growing, persistent, consistent leaks.

For those who doubt Bill Uhouse working on classified projects, there is a photo that this author found that shows him standing in a clean suit next to one of the same NERVA fission rocket engines that Stanton Friedman worked on.

Instead of laughing off purported deep insiders, teams of investigative journalists should be digging for more informants and corroboration.

They should also be prepared to find that all this back-engineering was not in vain, that we have achieved a scientific harvest that bloomed in the skies over the Mojave desert and over Groom Lake.

The plain facts are that there are scores and scores of high-quality observations of highly anomalous non-aerodynamic objects that were seen over Area 51 prior to, and after, "The Robert Lazar Episode."

A radio technician, with a very high security clearance, glimpsed what appeared to be a small 30-foot disc sitting on a runway in Area 51 and in flight. This individual also saw crates from Edwards AFB stenciled "Project Red Light" that seemed to be related to these flight tests.

Not only have skeptics and aerospace journals failed to confront the Area 51 sighting database, they have utterly ignored highly detailed accounts by very skilled observers that give us clues about the dimensions and scale of field propulsion testing that was going on until the late 1990's. Activity at Area 51 seems to have declined sharply past the late 90's, indicating a shift in the base of operations to a new more occult site.

Consider the following testimonial by a pilot with 2400 hours of high performance aircraft experience.

The event took place on December 15-16th 1994. His highly detailed account is several pages in length. Tantalizing observations included 5-6 craft taking off from Papoose Lake, one at a time , individually practicing "hovering" with small jerky movements, centered around one spot over a runway, for ten minutes.

Click on the 'NEXT' arrow for page 3

Share this article with: