However -- because Jesus at the Cross has since liberated us - during the forthcoming return passage of this glowing red "winged globe", there will discharge down to Earth a blazing red column of electrified plasma, illuminating the sky, so that all the World shall see this image of both the outstretched arms of Yeshua [God is the Saviour, in Hebrew], and the tree post on which He was hung, the horizontal and the vertical together forming the cross of the Messiah, Jesus Christ, proclaiming to all people remaining on the "burning" (ISAIAH 24) Earth, all of whom having rejected His sacrificial death for them, while proclaiming to recalcitrant mankind that it is now too late to repent, and that the Saviour has now become the Judge, raining down "death and hell" upon remorseless mankind, just as He had warned in His scriptural words:

MATTHEW, Chapter 24: [the words of Jesus:]

Verse 30 "And then shall appear the sign [of the cross] of the Son of man in heaven [in the sky]: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory [the sign of the cross in the sky].

If we lack His protection, God is herein declaring that you and I are soon to be "burned" [ISAIAH 24] in the coming destruction of Planet Earth.

Therefore, you will surely be eager to help me to either refute or verify my translation of ISAIAH 63: 6 and its previous 5 verses. Will you help, knowing that we can obtain God's meaning, protection and lead others to His protection?

For those of you who want to survive and who want to help others to survive, I implore you to examine ISAIAH, Chapter 63, verses, 1 through 6 of your Bible (preferably the King James version):

Is your life and mine in peril? Under threat from God, as stated here clearly in ISAIAH 63? Let us consult "Strong's Concordance" and find out whether or not God's weapon of slaughter will indeed manifest as this blazing drive-by comet, which He calls "the destroyer" in Exodus, Chapter 12, and in 1st Corinthians, Chapter 10.

Here are the Hebrew language definitions originating from the English mistranslation "strength," in a regression, back to the original Hebrew word, as indexed by Strong's number 5332, and its root words, indexed by numbers 5331 and 5329. I quote directly from the Strong's Concordance:

"5332 Netsach" [JD: notice that this "Netsach" is a proper noun, as opposed to the common noun forms of "netsach" given in Strong's numbers 5331 and 5329. The fact that it is a proper noun means that it has a name.

[JD: notice how obscure the word "strength" is amidst the uniform clarity of the definition preceding "strength"? Now, let us move on to 5331, the word stated as being "identical with" 5332.]

"5331 netsach, neh'-tsakh; or nay'-tsakh; from 5329; prop. a goal,
i.e." [now, "i.e. is the abbreviation for the Latin words "id est",
meaning "that is," meaning "specifically," not to be confused
with "e.g." which is "exempli gratia" [Latin]: "for example" or
"as an example".

Continuing with Strong's #5331: "i.e. [specifically] the bright object at a distance travelled towards; hence (fig.), splendor or (subj.) truthfulness, or (obj.) confidence; but usually (adv.), continually (i.e. [specifically] to the most distant point of view):

-- alway (-s)" "constantly, end, (+n) ever(more), perpetual,
strength, victory."

[JD: I infer that "-s" means "never append an "s" at the end of "alway"; therefore, "alway" should mean "all the way", distance wise]

Now, let us move on to the Hebrew definition indexed by Strong's
#5329, from which Strong's states that #5331, previously transcribed,
is derived:

Click on the 'NEXT' arrow for page 4

Share this article with: