|
Distinguished physicist Professor Russell Stannard points out that science "only describes how things behave. That's all science ever does. It describes how point-like objects behave in space and time and it manages to do that without ever coming clean about the nature of the stuff that makes up either the objects, or the space, or the time. Put that way, it can sound like a pretty modest enterprise."
Speaking about a new edition of The New Physics, entitled: The New Physics for the Twenty-First Century, Robert Matthews, science writer, writes in the New Scientist that:
"It remains hard to escape the conclusion that there just hasn't been much progress toward answering the Big Questions since the publication of the first edition (1989). That is not to deny that some very significant discoveries have been made. But all too often these discoveries have shown that physicists are far from reaching their summit, and in some cases may be on the wrong path altogether." He goes on to say that: "The impression is one of physicists not so much approaching a beckoning peak as wandering about in a thick fog."
Many scientists think it is impossible for anything-let alone an extraterrestrial alien-to traverse the vast distances of space to get here. The reasoning goes that nothing in the universe can travel faster than the speed of light, 186,000 miles per second per second. The nearest planet detected thus far is about 10 light years away. If we were to travel to this planet using our present relatively primitive rocket technology, it would take us about 350 million years to get there. Einstein's famous equation E = mc˛ implies that even if we could travel at the speed of light, as we approached that speed, our mass and that of the spaceship we were travelling in would increase to infinity. It is plain to see that this would be out of the question. So the laws of physics appear to negate the possibility of our ever being able to reach anywhere habitable or vice versa.
However, Ian Crawford of University College London says that, "contrary to popular belief, faster-than-light speeds are not explicitly forbidden by special relativity." He points out that there are a number of concepts that aliens might use to defy the speed of light. For instance they might use "wormholes," shortcuts through space/time created by the natural design features of the universe. Space, it seems, is elastic. You can stretch it or even tear it. It is claimed that it is not beyond the realms of possibility that space can be folded. If two points in elastic space can be moved closer together, then travelling enormous distances across the void would not be necessary to get from one place to another. "The mere fact" that to travel faster than the speed of light "may be permitted by the laws of physics means that it might just be possible," says Crawford.
World renowned physicist Dr. Michio Kaku warns that the chances are that any alien life advanced enough to reach our planet is likely to be predatory in nature. He argues that human beings as the top of the food chain on this planet are predators and any intelligent life form, especially one that is capable of the advanced technology necessary for space travel is also likely to be predatory. Interestingly, he believes that it would be folly for Governments to make knowledge of such visitation public owing to the panic it would cause. What an unmitigated presumption this implies. If the evidence is as real as the reliable witness end of the spectrum suggests would you not want the right to know about it? Common to almost all abduction reports is the kidnap of human victims, the removal of sperm and ova and the conducting of painful invasive surgical procedures with complete disregard for human pain and discomfort. Children are by no means exempt from these assaults, assaults that are so horrendous that many suffer the aftermath over several years. The apparent focus on the human reproductive capacity would imply that this is a phenomenon that might have profound biological implications for our species never mind the trauma faced by those who experience it.
If there is any chance that we are to any extent the victims of an external power seeking to manipulate us for their purposes and not ours is it not crucial we take a more serious look at the whole phenomenon? From a firm sceptic I have changed to a firm believer in this premise after twenty years of dedicated research into the phenomenon. There really is a huge case to answer.
A handful of cases possibly linking the MMR vaccine with autism led to millions of parents understandably refusing the vaccine for their children. A rare side effect of aspirin inchildren has led to the medicine being banned for children under twelve. Yet despite volumes of evidence from reliable sources about alien interference and sometimes even assault on our species, we are not motivated to look further. We are not stirred even with the curiosity to seriously and pervasively explore the subject. We are happy to allow our media to sweep the whole subject under the carpet. Why is this so? I can't help feeling to paraphrase Shakespeare in Hamlet that 'there is something deeply rotten in the state of Denmark' when it comes to looking meaningfully at the UFO phenomenon. You can include the USA and the UK as two of the main players in that rotten state of things. But then with the lies perpetrated by both governments to bring about the Iraq war is it any surprise. Their callous misjudgements and devious wranglings have claimed hundreds of thousands of innocent lives. Would you blindly trust them with the lives of millions of our children if the UFO phenomenon turns out to be true and predatory extra terrestrial entities are creeping and seeping their way into humanity for their own purposes and not ours?
For more information or to purchase Nigel Kerner's newest book, simply click on the title: Grey Aliens and the Harvesting of Souls: The Conspiracy to Genetically Tamper with Humanity
|
Today:
Printer
friendly version
