|The Official History of "The RR3 UFO Specimen": CONCERNING THE ALLEGED ROSWELL UFO PIECE
by Derrel Sims, CM.Ht, R.H.A
ORIGINAL UFO Investigator for The RR3 CASE.
(Copyright © 1997-2007, Saber Enterprises)
Posted: 02:15 April 4, 2007
Here is the latest information on "The RR3 UFO Specimen." Noted UFOlogist and "Alien Hunter," Derrel Sims, speaks with Dr. Russell Vernon Clark for the latest information regarding the RR3 object. Dr. Clark personally states that the "RR3 Specimen," an alleged piece of Roswell UFO "crash debris" was found NOT to be Extraterrestrial. He further states that the original results were wrong.
Now, for the first time, Derrel Sims recounts "The Official History of 'The RR3 Specimen' " for readers of UFO Digest:
April 4, 2007:
This is a response to many inquiries that I have received concerning the alleged "Roswell UFO Piece" (a.k.a. "RR3") given to me on Aug 19, 1995.
Numerous bogus claims have been made "long after it was scientifically proven" that the piece was very terrestrial! Why these claims continue should be obvious to your readers. The science is in…I just checked (again!) with numerous scientists on this "find".
"The RR3 Specimen" is not a part or piece of a UFO. I now wish I had never seen the object or been a party to this seemingly endless attempt to make this object into something it is not. This includes recent statements by some that the object defies camera filming.
That's funny! Mike Portanova filmed it with great skill and beauty. In fact, most of the photos taken of it are his excellent work." But now, science and the scientists have spoken. I think its time for others to be quiet.
Royce Meyers, the "Watchdog of UFOlogy," hit the nail right on the head in his UFO updates statement recently. Royce is a cop and a good one…it was his discovery concerning the cattle mutilation on our site that opened up the find of "Pure bovine Hemoglobin" (by Nancy Talbot/Dr. W.C. Levengood).
Royce is a friend to Ted Oliphant (the Fife, Alabama cop who's brilliant work on cattle mutes left all of us wondering) and both are friends of mine. Both men are "stand up guys." Here is the entire history on this case and the FINAL results of the testing of the "Alleged Roswell UFO Object" (also known as "RR3") to date.
IT IS MOST CURIOUS HOW THESE THINGS HAPPEN. I HOPE THOSE WHO READ THIS CAN READ IT AND UNDERSTAND CLEARLY AS TO WHAT HAPPENED HERE.
IT IS OBVIOUS (TO ALL THOSE WHOM I KNOW) EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED IN THIS "PARTNERSHIP TO MAKE THIS A "UFO EVIDENCE" STORY.
THE REAL STORY NOW IS WHY THE BAILOUT? WHY THE OBVIOUSLY UNTRUE "I DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT ANY OF THIS" STORY FROM SO MANY "EXPERTS," WHO WILL REMAIN UNNAMED.
HERE THE WHOLE HISTORY, BEGINNING IN 1995, REGARDING "THE RR3 SPECIMEN," PURPORTED TO HAVE BEEN A PIECE OF THE ROSWELL UFO.
As I promised, you are welcome to post this in total on your site. There is a lot more to the story. I think this is enough for now.
THE CONTROVERSIAL ALLEGED ROSWELL UFO PIECE…
SCIENCE FACT OR SCIENCE FICTION?
It began on MAY 17, 2001…IN THIS DARING AD, WE READ:
IS THIS AN ACTUAL PIECE OF THE ROSWELL CRAFT?
On a night the world will never forget, you'll be a part of history in the making! For the highlight of the conference, the New Mexico crash debris will be shown to the public. Is this an actual piece of a flying saucer? This is the material you've only heard about that's so controversial it was banned from network television! Now, you can see it for yourself.
Sign Up Now! ufoxfiles.com/convention.asp
In another unrelated add we read:
FOR PROOF OF EXTRATERRESTIAL UFO CRASH EVIDENCE!
SINCE NONE HAVE COLLECTED THE MILLION DOLLARS REWARD FOR "THE UFO PIECE" YET, I THOUGHT A CLARIFICATION ON THE MATTER MIGHT BE IN ORDER.
After the announcement (at the Roswell Conference on the 50th anniversary of the Roswell Crash in 1997) revealing "The RR3 Specimen" a purported piece of the Roswell UFO that could potentially be both "extraterrestrial" and manufactured, I ordered additional testing and my associate, Dr. Vernon Clark, sent collated results out for peer review.
This honest in-house peer review brought clarity to the analysis that was done and it has finally brought closure as to the claim of the "extraterrestrialness" of the object.
One other scientist, on May 3, 2001, also stated to me on this day that same conclusion as Dr. Vernon Clark: The piece is not of extra-terrestrial origin.
Honorable men and women of science have worked to find the truth of this object. They paid with their reputations at stake and some of them paid out of their pockets too.
In the best interests of these scientists, UFOlogy and the truth, this final bit of information is offered. Hopefully this will put to rest the story of the "alleged Roswell UFO piece."