UFO Extraterrestrial Political Tsunami
by Ed Komarek
Key to Councilor Hicks bold political tactics is in addressing the issue directly in a well articulated manner forcing political opponents into a difficult position. Opponents have two choices to either promote his message by publicity attacking him, or hold back and allowing Mr. Hicks to get his message out to the global public in an undistorted fashion. Interestingly I seem to have evolved the the same tactic with my blog. Of course this tactic only works when the message is conveyed in an articulate, honest and truthful manner.
I have asked Councilor Hicks to provide some insight into his tactics so that policymakers around the world can benefit from his experience and bold decisive leadership with this UFO/ET issue. Here are Adrian's comments.
"Thank you for your reply. My tactics so far have been simple. The Judgment and Democracy speech www.colinandrews.net/UFO-Councillor-Hicks3.html was to give them (MJ 12 and Space Command) the opportunity to reply should they so wish. Indeed, for my part, I feel I put it on a plate for them. This has been a very steep learning curve for me. It has taken me awhile to get to the bottom of it all, but I think I have now."
"So tactically I have gone out of my way not to challenge those in charge of this. I wanted to give them an opportunity to reply. Yes, I have started a path, and I am in for the long haul. Please note, I am up for re-election next year, but there are many things I could and would do. I believe this should be done with their blessing at this time. We are in the most interesting time in history. Adrian"
Councilor Hicks message while bold in it's public presentation seems to be moving in the direction of advocating a political conciliatory position towards MJ 12 -NSA, or the PTB (Powers That Be), similar to that advocated by the Military UFO Working group and Source A in the United States. exopolitics.blogspot.com/2009/03/naval-officer-source.html This would be the national reconciliation approach as implemented in South Africa to end Apartheid involving a conditional surrender and general amnesty of all groups involved in criminal and human rights violations.
This reconciliation approach would seem to be at odds with the unconditional surrender approach that advocates crushing MJ 12 - NSA and trying the leaders for war crimes and other human rights abuses. This approach would involve treating the super-secret Satellite UFO/ET Government as a terrorist organization to be targeted and destroyed. Such an approach would not go down well with the agencies involved and this brings up the issue of threats against those advocating UFO/ET disclosure. I would like to deal with the issue of threats in yet another article on specific issues related to integration into extraterrestrial reality.
I would expect many global politicians and military leaders to favor the reconciliation approach because they don't seem to have the courage to confront MJ - NSA or what it has evolved into head on. The untimely death of Congressman Schiff years ago www.anomalies.net/archive/cni-news/CNI.0800.html and threats leveled against politicians to this day seems to have kept the politicians scattered like coveys of frightened quail harassed by a hawk.
I see a double standard where young solders are expected by politicians to put their lives on the line daily in the many wars around the globe against fascism and terrorism, but high level political and military leaders should not be expected to do the same in a case like this. No matter, at some point it will be the people who will decide which of these two approaches or something in between will be the course taken. It's easy to take the reconciliation approach when one has not been a victim of this 70 year old UFO/ET cover-up.