video cams capture UFO evidence
 
10th ANNIVERSARY
Google
WEB UFODIGEST


Editor and Publisher:
Dirk Vander Ploeg
Associate Editor:
Robert Morningstar



Ufo Sightings
Ufo Photos
Ufo Videos - YouTube
Alien Abduction
Bermuda Triangle
Cryptozoology
Ghosts
Hollow Earth Theory
Holy Grail
Lost Civilizations
Mars
Paranormal
Space
Time Travel



Latest Articles
View Contributors
Writers Needed



Forums
Newsfeeds
Newsletter
Submissions



Advertising
Book Reviews
Contact Us
Privacy Policy
Video Store



English.Pravda.RU
NPN.Ehost.Pl
The Paranormal Report
UFOCaseBook.Com
Unexplainable.Net
OvniParanormal





the latest news about UFO sightings and UFO news Today:       Printer friendly version      
To Those Who Do Not Understand
'CGI-deaology'

by Kris Avery 

(Copyright 2008, Kris Avery - all Rights Reserved)


Now, just how many questions in the above rant are actually questions that can be answered from the information we have?

If Mr White had actually invested any time in actual truth seeking or investigation in regard to the drones, he would know all about the research that has gone on, he would also know about my own personal involvement in the research.

What he doesn't seem to appreciate is that it is pointless trying to ascertain whether the drones use "Biefeld Brown effects", tap into power lines, store energy, or the pattern of their deployment because on the evidence and information we have, it is impossible to determine! It would be total conjecture!

Before any time is wasted postulating as to their power source, origin, functionality or use, it needs to be concluded that they are in fact real in the first place!

I wrote back to Mr White with the following, and never received a reply...

"You are wrong on every account, and I have done a massive amount of research and I seek the truth. As far as I am concerned after all my study, the drones are fake... a hoax. There is little reason right now for me to invest my time studying something I don't believe to be true. I wasted a whole year studying it, so don't give me the high and mighty speech. I've heard it a million times before. I'll say to you what I have said a hundred times... The drones aren't real. The story doesn't stand up. The photo witnesses don't seem to exist, and the images stink of 3D CG.
I have seen a true UFO, and it was an amazing experience that I will never forget. These drones are fake. Enough said.

Kris"

I have witnessed a true UFO, it was one of the greatest days of my life, and is etched into my mind for all time. I for one KNOW that there is something visiting this planet. What I saw moved so fast that I do not believe we are even remotely capable of achieving such speeds with total silence.

So when it comes to the study of UFOs, all I seek is the truth. No other study exists in this world that is abused so heavily by hoaxers, jokers and money making leeches. I am none of these, and all I ever set out to do was to find the truth and share my knowledge. We all have an angle of attack when trying to solve a problem. We are all unique.

Myself, being the acclaimed "CG-Idiot" approached the drone case having seen the initial wave of photos that were put anonymously onto the internet. This first batch of images looked rendered (from a CG package). But can I prove it? What counts as proof? How many people's opinions count as validation? Proof was not my goal. I merely wanted to show that a CG model was a distinct possibility.

What seemed to be missed over and over again by every man and his dog, is that I didn't set out to prove the Drones were fake/ CG. All I wanted was to even the playing field. There were some very vocal individuals who made ridiculous claims that it was impossible for the drones to be created using CG and that they were totally real. They could no more prove they were real than I could prove them fake. And yet, it was these same individuals who would keep laying down the gauntlet, challenging me to recreate the drones perfectly. No matter what I did however, they would always come back saying that the work I did was no where even close to the original drone images. But it is easy to say something is fake when you know this fact before hand, is it not?

Some would see me crucified for questioning the reality of the drones. They believe in them so blindly, but with zero evidence. A CG guy is a focus of hate because perhaps they bring into question all photographic and video evidence. However, this isn't the fault of a person who creates CG images; it is the inevitable outcome of the advancement in digital photography and 3D imaging software. Inevitable.

In this modern world, we no longer have photographic negatives, and we have the internet, which allows for totally anonymous submission of images. The drone case plays directly into the hands of this modern technology, it exploits it.


Click on the 'NEXT' arrow for page 3



Share this article with:

More Articles:
Experimental Craft or Sci-Fi Creation
Backyard UFO
2006 Year End Wrapup
Detroit UFO Sighting
The Conditioning of Mankind
Possible Triangle UFO Video
Rocketeer Captures Strange Aerial Object
Multiple UFOs Over Cogolin, France
Conversations with an Abductee
UFO Photographed during Carnival Flyby!
Zmora - Night Terror



Translate this page
Translate from
  

UFODIGEST.COM All rights reserved.
FAIR USE NOTICE:
This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.

Ufodigest Newsletter

Signup today for one of the best Paranormal and UFO newsletters on the Internet. FREE! Sample Issue: May 22, 2008

UFO Digest newsletter!