The Tesla Crop Glyph Tapping the Transdimensional Wheelwork of Nature by M.G. Whitney

“Perhaps not as doomed as trying to prove the world is flat,” Baez says. “One thing I can say is that I sure hope it doesn’t work, because if you could extract energy from the vacuum, it would mean that the vacuum is not stable. For normal physicists,” he adds with a laugh, “the definition of the vacuum is that it’s the lowest-energy situation possible—it has less energy than anything else.” In short, Baez says, while we may be able to get energy from the vacuum, success “would mean the universe is far more unstable than we ever dreamed.
The reasoning goes like this: If the vacuum is not at the lowest energy state possible, then at some point in the future, the vacuum could fall to a lower state, pulsing out energy that would threaten the very structure of the cosmos. If some clever engineer were ever to extract energy from the vacuum, it could set off a chain reaction that would spread at the speed of light and destroy the universe. Free energy, yes, but not what the inventors had in mind.
This man is clearly biased. He suggests that if I or anyone else thinks the opposite, that Dark Energy has a HIGHER energy density than anything else it’s abnormal. What is abnormal is ignoring the fact that the vacuum is INFINITE potential energy (regardless of its measured local value, see Mach) and has no regard for convenient renormalization. He never considers that falling to a lower energy state is actually all the “Big Bang” ever was, that this Phase-Transition/Explosion had no center, and created things (or was negentropic).
Dark Energy fits right in with KK theory, M theory etc,…It’s DARK because it is asynchronous and asymmetrical to us as it is in HIGHER dimensions not necessarily because it’s self-canceling. The Branefall or Transdimensional wave filters through the dimensions becoming matter and the forces maintaining matter; what we consider self-canceling or the difficulty of measurement is really the SEAMLESSNESS and PERMEABILITY of the dark energy transdimensional wave.
The next article provides corroborative astronomical evidence for the claims of the Auto-Inductive Rectenna:
spacedaily.com
"When a microwave enters a supercluster, it gains some gravitational energy, and therefore vibrates slightly faster," explained Szapudi. "Later, as it leaves the supercluster, it should lose exactly the same amount of energy.
But if dark energy causes the universe to stretch out at a faster rate, the supercluster flattens out in the half-billion years it takes the microwave to cross it. Thus, the wave gets to keep some of the energy it gained as it entered the supercluster."
The analogy to the AIR is:
Dark Energy = Static Field
Supercluster = Population Inversion in discharge tube
Microwave = DC induced Scroll Wave
It may be reworded to state that a static field exciting a gaseous medium, when heterodyned with additional energy, will gain energy from the static field.
As Tesla stated, and John Baer added, if the Dark Energy is static/the lowest possible energy state then it is in vain, if the Dark Energy is unstable or capable of Branefall from higher energy states then it is totally possible. It is likely that the vacuum only displays its kinetic side on extremely tiny and extremely large scales as evidenced by vacuum fluctuations and an expanding universe.
The AIR – Associated terms: Scroll Electret, Inertial Electrostatic Confinement (IEC), Bipolar Spark Gap Transistor, Aether Sink, Scroll Wave, Kreb’s Cycle, Abnormal Glow, Open Path, Negative Resistor, Multipactor.
| Click on the 'NEXT' arrow for page 3 |
 |
Share this article with your friends:
|