Now I will point my finger at the great many scientists that came after Einstein.
Why didn't someone, using Einstein's own concepts, not apply this new framework of understanding to a universal frame of reference that is itself static from our point of reference? This lack of foresight and misinterpretation in Einstein's work is so incorrect that it has stifled the progress of science for over a hundred years and it continues to stifle and makes it impossible to unite relativistic and quantum physics ever without inventing silly imaginary mathematical contraptions like String Theory. I find it hard to believe that with so many amazing minds not even one of them thought that perhaps things were being read backwards. My work and paper takes Einstein's theories and expands on it and what I've found is overwhelming. I have found the mathematical unification of physics. That is a big claim that urge you take with a grain of salt. Why? Because you have to objectively analyze it for yourself and contemplate on the details and subsequent ramifications of my paper 'Realitivistic Relativity' and my many related theories in my eBook 'The General Principles of Reality A' (or GPRA). To do otherwise is not science.
Is there proof for these claims?
Yes there is.
There is evidence that astronauts traveling and living in space at high velocities have actually aged faster than people on Earth. There is also evidence that clocks on board spacecrafts have actually diverged from Earth clocks by increasing in time passed. The clocks are dismissed as malfunctioning due to the stresses of space travel, but honestly there is no good explanation and to me this is empirical evidence my theory is correct. The working explanation for the aging as concluded by our space agencies is that increased space radiation ages human tissue faster by damaging it faster than it would be damaged here on Earth. The act of aging is attributed to damages to our DNA and scarring of our flesh over our lifetime. The more one damages his or her body, such as through severe drug addiction and alcoholism, then the faster they age and the more they physically appear older. Induced willingly or allowing it naturally is still aging. You see the big misconception of aging is that aging is the passage of time. Aging is not the passage of time, but they are related. Damages to your body compound over a certain time span and that is what aging actually is.
If you have two individuals, one protected in an underground bunker with thick concrete walls living a healthy lifestyle and another person Sun bathing everyday while drinking alcohol for 3 years, the individual in the bunker would have aged slower physically in relation to the other person absorbing Sun radiation and toxic beverages. Aging is itself also very relative. Now here's my point, if you take two identical individuals, healthy individuals, and put one traveling around the Earth in a heavily shielded spacecraft traveling at enormous velocities while leaving the other individual on Earth, the individual in space will still age faster. The only thing that changed was their velocity frame of reference. In fact, the individual in space was intentionally protected from greater exposure to radiation but still aged faster. This is the evidence all space agencies know. Scientists know that many quantum particles cannot be shielded and travel through your body every moment of everyday even here on Earth and these particles overtime contribute to compounded damages in your body aging you physically. This is a natural and normal state of aging and common to all living creatures on this planet.
The problem is that this natural state of aging increases when you travel at higher velocities. Why? Because the density of this these quantum particles increase at higher velocities and pass through your body in a higher density effectively aging you faster only because your velocity increased. Now apply this reasoning, which is scientifically proven, to the theories of relativity (mine and Einstein's). Space is filled with quantum particles even if they are more diluted than in a piece of matter, but essentially these diluted quantum particles, traveling at enormous velocities, are interrelated with the density of space. It can be said that if observer A is traveling at velocity Y and observer B is traveling at velocity X where Y>>X, that observer A is living in a denser space-time than observer B and one consequence is that time travels faster for observer A than B. The other consequence is if space-time density is higher for observer A than B, then observer A's physical structure would also be affected and essentially be smaller than that of observer B's in order to experience the universal physics the same in all inertial frames of reference. The ratio of matter density to space density would therefore be a physical constant.
As mentioned before, the one experiment favouring Einstein's current time dilation interpretation is riddled with interference from the experimenting apparatus and further compounded by misinterpretations. The experiment deals with a short lived quantum particle that last longer when accelerated to velocities closer to the speed of light in a linearly direction. There are so many problems with this experiment. First of which, and the most significant, are that these particles are being confined in a strong magnetic field produced by the apparatus and then accelerated in a linear direction. If the particle disintegrated along this linear path of acceleration while confined in the strong magnetic field, no one would know because all disintegrated fragments of the particle would still be traveling together in the same direction allowing it to appear to have lived a longer lifespan. This is immensely erroneous.
| Click on the 'NEXT' arrow for page 3 |  |
|
Today:
Printer
friendly version
