I might mention for you physicists, that it's interesting that the mountain-down-mountain-up phenomenon beneath the huge, elongated 'carrier' (with some wonderful, huge deltoid objects milling around each other at some distance off the 'carrier's' south end) is within the very narrow, extremely low-frequency range of waves of change in acceleration due to gravity that were recorded in two of the aforementioned July, 1978, UFO encounters (in New Mexico and Arizona), wherein the gravimeter sensor was deployed.

So, in case someone hasn't realized it, we have here well-documented optical and electronic evidence of gravity or gravity-like waves associated with UFOs, and in very much the same frequency-ballpark.

During that 12-04-80 Tizayuca, Mexico, Braniff Flight 56 daylight movie, which was filmed in highly polarized light (explanation available), several of the shuttle type smaller objects repeatedly generate what seem to be pretty nice sets of alternately light and dark rings that may be due to Faraday rotation of backlight passing through an object's magnetic field under appropriate ion-state conditions across the field of passage. 

However the most wonderful set of rings seemingly due to Faraday rotation of backlighting yet found in the movie, clearly reveals that at the moment a biconvex disc took off at incredible speed, 21 absolutely beautiful concentric light-and-dark rings were generated!  The ring thickness increases in mathematical precision, with distance from the disc generating them, in what looks just like the same kind of way in which waves propagate our from where a pebble has been dropped in water.

A little more description on that seems advisable though: The pebble you drop (with its plane of symmetry parallel to the water surface upon striking it) into the smooth water is eight-sided (In an earlier release concerning this, I mistakenly 'remembered' it as six-sided.), with the result that the first few radial waves are octagonal.  As the radial waves propagate, they quickly transform into concentric circles.

That is exactly the case with the twenty-one expanding-with-distance concentric rings generated by the little (as compared to the huge 'carrier' object or 'mothership) domed disc off the north end of the 'parent' object. So spectacularly perfect and beautiful is that particular ring array that on one very pretty electronic PowerPoint slide of it, I declare, "There are times when we dream...and times when dreams come true!"

If it should happen that those rings are not due to Faraday rotation, then one might justifiably feel they could be due to something even more interesting and scientifically significant. I could say a lot more about exotic seeming field effects, both in that movie and upon electronic technology during the 12-04-80 event, per se, but must leave that to the coming in-depth publication and evidence analysis.

By the way, any of you TV-talking head skeptics out there can forget any idea of 'explaining' those beautiful filmed rings as Newtonian rings. Such a pseudo-explanation is utterly ridiculous because they're on the original film, per se. Then too, the images from the film used in my PowerPoint presentation of the movie evidences, were made with no glass on either side of the movie film, the filmed images being projected directly onto the wonderful old Cibachrome color photo paper, with which no intermediate negative is required.

Those 21 concentric rings are exactly in-plane with the plane of radial symmetry of the emitting discoid object.  The disc's plane of radial symmetry is tilted well out-of-parallel with the photo plane as to its vertical component, but also well out of the horizontal photo-plane component.

Now, please allow me to say something about one person's comment concerning videos and digital photo dangers. Well taken, but remember that I'm not talking about electronic (neither analog nor digital) movies or digital still photos.  As stated earlier, keep in mind that our really important movie and photo evidence is on good, old-fashioned color film emulsion.

Considering the scientific implications of that 12-04-80 'mountain dance' beneath the 'carrier' filmed from our steeply climbing airliner and our comparable gravimeter recordings, I beg to differ with anyone's insistence that my project's evidence couldn't make it into mainstream physical science journals.  Of course, presentation must be done only with an at-face-value approach, and with no UFO 'gee whiz it's an alien spaceship' kind of declaration. Publication can be accomplished, with a world-class physicist (or two) who has (have) not spoiled an otherwise good reputation with 'mainstream physics' by personal behavior unacceptable to 'the establishment'.  

Still not enough evidence, you think?  Well, say that only, if you then dare, after having seen it published or, in the interim, after seeing my PowerPoint presentation of over 425 electronic slides.

Click on the 'NEXT' arrow for page 7.

Share this article with: