We can see references to this sort of activity in Corso's Book, The Day After Roswell. Corso spent a lot of time and effort attempting to evade the CIA in the Army's limited effort to distribute small amounts of Roswell debris to industrial and defense corporations. It is obvious from Corso's book that it was the CIA rather than the military who were in primary control over this activity.

I believe that control over this hugely profitable collection-exploitation process is accomplished through the buying of military and intelligence community cooperation and the Corporation acting as the sole general contractor distributing ET technology and contracts to cooperating private defense and industrial corporations. If you don't cooperate you don't get fed.

Much documentation as to the early stages of the UFO/ET cover-up has been leaked or declassified which has been of apparent benefit to UFO investigators. I say apparent because the evidence suggests to me that the release of these early documents seems to have served a more deceptive secret agenda meant to divert attention away from the current organizational structure of the cover-up and exploitation of ET technologies.

This is a very important point that seems to have been overlooked by UFO/ET investigators both in the public domain and in the military. We in public, government and the military cannot target and remove obstacles to UFO/ET disclosure if we can't understand the nature of the adversary attacking us or the strategies employed against us by the adversary.

Naturally, the reader will ask, where is the evidence to support this speculation? I think the most important pieces of evidence comes from the testimony of Dr. Ben Rich the past head to Lockheed's Skunk Works. Ben stated before his death, "1. There are 2 types of UFOs -- the ones we build and ones 'they' build. We learned from both crash retrievals and actual "hand-me-downs." The Government knew and until 1969 took an active hand in the administration of that information. After a 1969 Nixon "purge", administration was handled by an international board of directors in the private sector."

7. It was Ben Rich's opinion that the public should not be told. He believed they could not handle the truth -- ever. Only in the last months of his decline did he begin to feel that the "international corporate board of directors" dealing with the "Subject" could represent a bigger problem to citizens' personal freedoms under the United States Constitution than the presence of off-world visitors themselves."

www.stealthskater.com/Documents/Andrews_02.doc

Further collaborating evidence comes from Whistle-blower Bill Uhouse. In this early report Bill was called Jrod but later the ET he worked with was called the Jrod. Bill Uhouse states, "Understanding how this social structure works is like trying to understand the internal relationships of a tight-knit family in some Asian culture."

"If any area seems dubious, he asks his boss about it, who says either "Okay" or "Let's hold off on that a while." For example, his boss said it was okay to mention Nixon as the founder of the satellite government, because "Nixon is dead." Playing by the rules is very simple for Jarod. He is not working from any rule book or security classification system."

"Jarod says the satellite government lives by its own laws, completely separate from the conventional government except for an interface with the military. It is not controlled by any other agency, so it does not have to obey the security regulations of other agencies. The fact that Jarod is allowed to speak does seem to imply permission from a higher level than the supervisor, but perhaps a word from management, without any paperwork, is all it takes to make something secret or not secret. Security could be both more intrusive than in any conventional defense program and more informal to those who are used to the structure. Consider the special circumstances....

Click on the 'NEXT' arrow for page 3

Share this article with: