The second UN UFO/ET meeting (the first held at Upstate NY) was held from March 24-26 and was chaired by the military liaison from Britain. Source A revealed that this was very productive in terms of consensus, goals and vision. A table of contents concerning key issues to be discussed was produced which presumably would help guide future discussions. This meeting lasted the full three days that were scheduled. China was present at the 2nd and subsequent meetings at Upstate NY and Europe.
The third UN UFO/ET meeting (second at Upstate NY) was chaired by the senior military liaison from France. According to Source A, this meeting was a disaster. This meeting ran from May 19-21 and focused on economic issues that was revealed in an earlier communication released by Clay and Sean Pickering (see: www.ufodigest.com/news/0608/how-cover-works.html ). This meeting lasted three days.
The fourth UN UFO/ET meeting was chaired by the senior US military liaison which was Source A. An attempt was made to find neutral territory, but was unsuccessful. This meeting again, according to Source A, was a disaster. It lasted only one day from the three scheduled. The meeting occurred just prior to Source A leaving for another covert assignment at the end of May 2008.
Source A emphasized that the US Navy (and Marines) has always been focused on overall policy issues concerning extraterrestrials, while the USAF handled contact with extraterrestrial life. The US Army, Department of Energy and Department of Homeland Security have been responsible for security and bases. This is corroborated by reports that extraterrestrials had in the past showed up USAF bases to deal with representatives of the Eisenhower administration (see: xopolitics.org/Study-Paper-8.htm ). Also, whistleblower reports confirm that Army forces have been involved with enforcing security at bases involving extraterrestrial related projects (see: exopolitics.org/Dulce-Report.htm ).
Source A said that USAF has handed off to the US Navy responsibility for a specific contact project involving the extraterrestrials discussed in the February 12 meeting (see: exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-66.htm ). That means that US Navy has begun to play a role in both setting policy and contact with at least one form of extraterrestrial life.
The fifth UN UFO/ET meeting was attended by the replacement of Source A whose identity has not been revealed. This meeting was again held in Upstate NY. According to the US Navy admiral in overall charge of the US delegation (led by Source A's replacement) the meeting was cordial.
The sixth meeting was held outside of the US (in Europe) for security reasons. According to the admiral, those involved in the European meeting were "doing good work."
Source A emphasized that the military liaisons at this series of UN inspired meetings were trying to get agreement on how to nations ought to respond to the prospect of extraterrestrial vehicles appearing over countries. It's worth pointing out that this is the same scenario that was debated in the Japanese parliament in December 2007. It led to the Japanese Minister of Defense making a statement concerning how the Japanese self defense force might respond to such a scenario (see: www.japannewsreview.com/politics/politics/20071220page_id=3567 ).
Source A said further that the admiral in charge of the covert disclosure process revealed the talking points for the last two meetings held without Source A's attendance. These included the following:
"What if [extraterrestrial] spacecraft start making demands?"
"If they [extraterrestrials] do make demands, what should be our responses as a collective people?"
If the craft appear without any hostile intent, there should be agreement that no hostile action is taken by any nation.
That NATO should take whatever measures necessary to ensure no hostile response is taken in response to the appearance of any ETV occurs.
International Banking systems should keep operating with minimal disruption to economic systems.
How to ensure the global distribution of extraterrestrial knowledge and technology.
According to Source A, point six was the most difficult issue in the discussions.
Threats to UN Diplomatic Community
I raised the issue of two independent reports that diplomats had been physically threatened to remain silent about UN discussions on UFOs and extraterrestrial life. I emphasized that one of the sources involved a senior European diplomat that had relayed that the physical threats were genuine and diplomats were being silenced.
|Click on the 'NEXT' arrow for page 4