Incorporating that spiritual dimension, some proponents of disclosure seem to have more of a mystical perspective on the world after disclosure. In the last four decades, the popularity of transcendental and metaphysical concepts has increased to surpass the level of the early 19th century, and parallels the vision and work of Madam H. P. Blatavasky. Theirs is a post-disclosure world of intimate association with Ascended Masters who assist mankind to achieve its true potential, and rise to the level of its Teachers. In essence, technological benefits, offered by the visitors, would allow man to realize his destiny, by alleviating much of the necessity of continually struggling for physical needs.
Militant disclosure advocates seem to fail to create a mental image of a world during and after disclosure, and to act upon this image in a substantive manner, unlike their adversaries, whose actions indicate an intimate awareness of what the process of disclosure will bring. The view of many disclosure proponents is simple – human problems of energy, food and health are mitigated and ameliorated, and we seem to continue being who we were, with perhaps a new set of friends in our cell phones, and possibly a few new reality shows on DTV. This group sees disclosure as simply another area onto which the pervasive concepts of contemporary human civilization, concepts such as trade and politics, or exopolitics, can be overlaid and perfected.
We know so very little of the actual mindset and motivations of these xenophiles who visit our beautiful planet. Are they merchants, mercenaries or missionaries? Do they share the multifaceted dreams and nightmares of our species? Are they homogenous or are they variegated in character, in sentiment? Are they really interested in us as individuals or are we some kind of resource or commodity?
We will inevitably find out just what is in store for us. Or, perhaps, what we are in the store for. In any event, some of us are aware that our perceptions and beliefs, founded on the accumulation of wealth and the care and feeding of number one, are insufficient and immature at best, and that any future which includes mankind as a member of some far-reaching intergalactic federation is a distant vision. We greet the visitors today with at least four general paradigms; that they are the enemy, they are our benefactors, they are our gods or they are not there at all.
Two things are consistent about the nature of this reality that seems to surround us. The universe is stochastic and fractal. Having noted this, one might be horrified to find that our visitors are nothing more than concentrated versions of ourselves, various groups having "discovered" earth, each with its own paradigm and moral inclinations.
Are we simply like those East Indian natives in 1492, happily and idyllically frolicking naked in the surf and noticing those strange white sails coming over the horizon?
|