Michael Knight has been a journalist, author and documentary director since 1960. He is Editor of the international Internet newsletter, http://www.buycontacthasbegun.com/subscribe.html "Earth Change Report" and author of the ebooks www.buycontacthasbegun.com "Earth Changes - Mind Matters," and www.buycontacthasbegun.com/howtopublic.html "How To Survive Earth Changes, Economic Depression and Martial Law." He is also Director of the documentary DVD, www.buycontacthasbegun.com "Contact Has Begun."
However, having been a photo-journalist, TV news cameraman and documentary maker/director since 1960, I’m inclined to trust my own judgment in such matters.
This was my reply: "the pic was taken by a subscriber (to my Earth Change Report newsletter) in Australia and personally I have no doubt at all that the photograph was not staged in any way.
“The thought that it might be beads shot out of focus is however understandable. Since it was shot through the windscreen of a vehicle, the possibility of light refraction was also considered before publication.
“Nevertheless the original (too large to print here) clearly shows cloud obscuring at least some of the object...as can be seen in this zoomed and cropped image...which in my judgment rules out both beads and refraction.”
Which elicited the following response: “Your photo on the web was virtually useless for anything involving photo-interpretation, from my POV, but of course I have not seen the original.
“Nor do I believe you mentioned the fact that it was shot through a windshield in the accompanying article, although it might have slipped my mind.
“Virtually anything shot through glass, especially a light source, is subject to secondary reflections. And windshields have all kinds of junk on them..”
That’s all true. But there are a couple of important observations to make here.
One is that I have no “reputation” hanging on the photograph or the story. Unlike many mainstream reporters and various authors, I actually believe readers should be given information which they can evaluate for themselves and come to their own conclusions, just as Mr. Brenner has.
I prefer having faith in people’s ability to think for themselves over the idea that anyone (me included) should be seen as an “authority” or “expert” with a reputation that needs defending.
Perhaps it’s the fact that there are so many opinions circulating about UFOs that has actually delayed wider public acceptance of their reality – and the likelihood of a mass encounter sometime in the near future.
Doubt has its place of course, especially if one is looking for facts and truth.
Nevertheless, it can also act like a set of blinders – of the sort that blind one to possibilities outside the so-called ‘normal.’
FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. This website distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107.