Why We Disavow New Report Supporting the WCUFO!by Michael Horn 
Not only did Chris Lock raise questions, he did a photo examination, at magnifications of from 200% - 600%, on specific sections of two images. One was of an area in a (2008) photo made by a debunker where Ron claimed that a Plejaren "shuttle craft" deliberately appears in said photo in order to debunker the debunker. The other image was from a section of a (1975) Meier UFO photo in which Ron claimed that he detected the exact same craft (at the exact same angle). Chris Lock's magnifications revealed that no such object was present in either photo and, troublingly, Ron's two photo versions attempting to show the "shuttle craft" in the debunker's photo, actually has it appearing in two different places, an apparently unnoticed by him error and a seemingly deliberate falsification on his part.
I have also waited to respond to the report until I received some word from FIGU in Switzerland about their reaction to the it. Now that I have received a *preliminary response from a FIGU spokesperson I am going ahead and publishing my position. Of course, should Ron and his partner credibly respond to all of the challenges referred to herein, I will not only publish them but issue an apology, should one be due.
Michael Horn
Authorized American Media Representative
The Billy Meier Contacts
www.theyfly.com
NOTE: All of my correspondence with Ron, establishing my skepticism and disagreement with his claims about evidence of so-called "aliens", "pictographs", "artwork", etc. is a matter of record, and can be made available if necessary.
* "After reading the analysis just now I have my severe doubts about the expertise of the two Rons. To me it seems like their imagination has run astray. They are seeing faces where there are none, at least not real ones. And their claim/announcement that they were able to detect various Aliens on the photo pushes their credibility nearly to zero, at least in my opinion."
Christian Frehner
FIGU
|
Today:
Printer
friendly version
