A Hard Look At UFOs
By Robert L. Mason
© Robert L. Mason November 30, 2008.
Posted: 02:00 December 3, 2008
Proposes an explanation for why hard physical evidence of UFOs with an extraterrestrial origin is so hard to fnd.
The modern era of UFOs is now over sixty years old. If we step back as far as we can and view the entire subject with the best possible perspective, one disconcerting fact is rather apparent. We have no hard physical evidence for an extraterrestrial origin. We have some physical trace evidence, but nothing so extraordinary that no other explanation can be offered. We have a vast amount of anecdotal evidence, and some of it is impressive. Jessie Marcel Jr. M.D. springs to mind. He is, by all accounts, a credible person,and he claims to have handled alien-looking materials that his father brought home from the Roswell crash site (2). Then there is Jim Penniston, an Air Force Sergeant with top-secret clearance, who says he touched what appeared to be an alien UFO in the Rendlesham Forest incident (4). But despite being credible, these reports are still anecdotal in nature.
If the materials that are rumored to have been collected by the military from various crash retrievals actually do exist, and if they were made available for free an open scientic investigation, and if that investigation concluded that there was no possible explanation for them other than they were the product of an extraterrestrial civilization, then we would have hard physical evidence. Just one piece of such evidence would be worth more than all the anecdotal evidence in existence. But that has not happened, and the result is tantamount to the same thing-no hard physical evidence.
So, does that mean we are not being monitored in some manner by an alien civilization? Not necessarily. What it could mean is the monitoring processis beyond our technical comprehension. Given current estimates of 13.7 billion years for the age of the Universe and 4.6 billion years for the age of the solar system it is obvious that there has been plenty of time for other civilizations to precede us and, consequently, be greatly advanced technically when compared to us. Can we make any guesses at all about how such an advanced civilization might operate? We can try.
One trap we may be falling into is thinking of alien spacecraft as highly advanced versions of what we are capable of building; whereas they may be something entirely different altogether. What can we imagine that could,among other things:
make right angle turns at extremely high velocities;
appear luminous or lighted in low light and solid in daylight;
have a radar signature;
be usually described as completely silent;
kill the engine of an automobile; and
leave physical traces such as burns on vegetation, etc.?
In my recent book The UFO Experience Reconsidered: Science and Speculation
(3), I argue that a charged particle beam aimed into our atmosphere from somewhere off the planet could, in fact, have all of these characteristics. In addition, if used in conjunction with an advanced capability in the quantum mechanical phenomenon known as "entanglement," it might enable remote sensing from considerable distances. Exactly how this would work is anybody's guess. My best guess is illustrated in Figure No.s 1 & 2 on the next page, and is based on a supercial knowledge of particle accelerators.
|Click on the 'NEXT' arrow for page 2