Santa Monica, CALIFORNIA — I was quite taken with Brad Steiger’s article “A Pre-Historic Nuclear War? World Before Our Own” and by the two questions that have driven him to date: 1.) Who are we as a species? 2.) What is our destiny?
Brad is an impressive expert, with a breath of knowledge about anomalous phenomena, ancient astronauts and UFOs. And yet, these questions are worth taking very seriously, but in a slightly different context than that in his article. Answers to them represent the outlines of a stance we must learn to take before we can cope with the challenge of Extraterrestrial presence on Earth; a challenge we can no longer ignore. Indirectly, this attempt is also a response to Brad, given our exchange of emails of late. If you all will allow me then, I’d like to contribute my five cents’ worth to the effort.
What I am about to share with you comes from years of exposure to information and to sources both inside and outside of the proverbial “fence.” My participation during my early professional years was modest and relatively nondescript – that is, until the summer of 1981 and a not so chancy face to face encounter with an alien that looked very much like us, and definitely not from the Zeti Reticulum system. (This taught me that not all aliens are 3 feet tall, bugeyed grayish, a most valuable lesson to date.) Since then, my life changed considerably, and the breath of exposure increased by several exponential powers. It is based on this latter phase of my life, that I would like to offer what I’ve been able to put together — for what it’s worth… So let me tackle the first question then, in order to set up premises for an answer to the second.
I was told during my initial contacts that there have been “previous worlds” prior to our own, as you state in your article, Brad. To them our notion of the Big Band is the transition from one cycle to the next. Civilizations much older than ours, I was told, have been here since time immemorial. But native life forms to Earth in those times have been at early stages in evolution as bipeds, that most of the evidence (footprints and handprints), including those found in Texas, have been theirs and left by others like them not from their kind, but rather from other advanced humanoid life forms with interstellar travel capabilities. I was also told that some 120 million years ago, sauroid (read, reptilian) life forms performed biotechnological interventions on a strain of life that eventually became what we know as dinosaurs. This was to be the primary life form on Earth to reach maturity as intelligent bipeds like them. We know now what happened to the dinosaurs. But, as everyone of them already knew then, Earth was and is still a relatively unstable planet (astrophysically speaking), given that it is located in the inner part of our solar system and visited periodically by a once transient planet captured by the combined gravitational effects of the Sun and Neptune, drawing it into the solar system at an angle of some 30-plus degrees of inclination. (Zechariah Sitchin reported on this in his books of the ‘Earth Chronicles’, but the data on which he drew is incomplete, according to this source.)
At any rate, the presence of this planetary body in the inner part of the solar system has been known to create considerable havoc in Sol’s inner planets, especially Earth. See the book by Derek S. Allan (a specialist in paleogeography and cartographic evidence for climatic and land form changes in recent geological times, particularly the Artic) and J. Bernard Delair (a geological surveyor with special interest in the present distribution of animal and plant life and attendant geophysical problems of early Holocene times) titled, When the Earth nearly died: Compelling evidence of a catastrophic world change in 9,500 B.C. (Gateway Books, UK, 1995), republished in 1997 as Cataclysm: Compelling evidence of a cosmic catastrophe in 9,500 B.C).
Allan and Delair have done a masterful job of presenting data difficult to argue with concerning the events on Earth which are due to these periodic encounters. According to the 1981 source, and several other off-world sources since, this has been and continues to be a
serious concern to survivability of intelligent life forms on Earth; yet, interest continues in very high degrees about Earth and its biological garden of genetic expressions on the part of extraterrestrial visitors — both friendly and hostile.
The transition of the mammalian life form that became complex enough to express intelligence, that is, us as homo sapiens sapiens (or Thinking Man) has not entirely been left to nature and to chance. There is considerable archeotechnical and archeoanthropological evidence that, not only did we come out of eastern Africa, but that a “lab” existed both above ground and underground north of the Ngorongoro area in Tanzania. I was once part of a team examining these remnants, and very interesting pieces of evidence were found at these sites. The work done by the Leakeys was a kind of semifinal nail on that cross, followed by mitochondrial DNA evidence of an Eve some 250,000-plus years ago, and the distribution of genetic haplogroups across the Earth simply went far in convincing us (especially me) that it all started there, and went out from there.
Interestingly, there is sufficient evidence too, now, that our genome is not only evolving at high speed, but that it also has commonalities with those of other intelligent life forms that have relationships (as TTP or technology transfer programs) with various organs of our government (and others across the world). It seems that, once upon a time, there was something of a pristine, “genesis DNA” of sorts. But that’s beyond the scope of our little discussion here. What is not, however, is the set of differences in rate and range of expression between DNA from off-world intelligent life forms (some, not all I know about) and ours. Even among us humans today, the rate of expression is a significant factor in discriminating between people who live sanely and healthily, and people who live driven by fear and self-repression.
We know now that interaction with our own DNA involves a similar, if not identical, set of access means driven by common or natural language sets — that is, we can talk our DNA into contracting its coils or relaxing and expanding them at will, with significant differences in the quality of life and health of people who do either one or the other. This is a factor currently being massively manipulated by hands both invisible and powerful enough (my own conclusion) to set up social and psychological environments highly propitious to instrumental conditioning and response set development on our part that are convenient and necessary to their control and manipulation.
This is especially true of the economy and expectations of the citizenry. We are not only being suppressed in overt expression of opinions, views, personal lifestyles that do not promote and contribute to the seemingly established goal of “social instability and psychological chaos,” as one informant of mine put it, but also in our internal rate and range of genetic expression of our own DNA!
Unbeknowned to us, it turns out that both FAVs (friendly alien visitors) and HAVs (hostile alien visitors) have expressed interests in our continuing to suppress ourselves on a mass basis; however, I have reason to believe now that the kids programs (so-called Star Children and others of that ilk) are sources of harvest and study by both types on how these kids are so ably turning on and off expressions that result in some amazing abilities and capacities, some of which not even the C-I, C-II, and C-III (Civilization types I, II, and III) EBEs (extraterrestrial biological entities) can. Thus, therein lies one of the clues to our destiny.
I will tie things together with other aspects of this at the end. Suffice it to say here that Earth offers a smorgasbord of DNAs at various stages of linear evolution of great interest to these folks. We happen to be one of such foci of interest, especially in our expressed abilities to love, to connect (without the need for external, technological assist) in modes the Russians had baptized as biocommunication and the Chinese as extended human functions, while we continue to be stuck on telepathy and clairvoyance. (It is this the primary reason a few of us got together and formed a scientific cooperative to loosen such conceptual and organizational restrains to reach for a much larger paradigm in which to evolve scientifically, an effort I helped spearhead since the early 90s.)
Who we are?
Now to your first question, Brad. As a species, or more properly, biokind (biological kind), we humans of Earth have a most promising future indeed, if left to our own devices. But we are not, and won’t be, so long as powerful offworld interests already merged with certain national interests in the form of TTPs (technology transfer programs) continue unabated. The answers to what and who we are and why we won’t be allowed to manifest our full regalia of capabilities are closely intertwined and must be considered together.
We are complex oscillating biological entities of broad horizontal connectivity (connectivity in our own 4-space/time) and unusually deep vertical connectivity (or the ability to extend in octavials damn near to the doors of heaven itself). One of the things we keep being reminded of by hyperversals entities (or people who actually live in space/times that are completely orthogonal, or off-phase to us here) is that, while we have yet to traverse a still longer evolutionary pathway, we are at this stage quite capable of the feats they are (i.e., travel in space and time without having to use a vehicle in space or leave our bodies behind in time), but don’t know how because we have told ourselves it is impossible, or worse yet, a sin.
Yet, we are told that these capabilities are literally inscribed in the still relatively pristine DNA of the kids being born today, and in the DNAs of adults who have guarded closely the preservation of the internal child. Knowing then who and what we are, it is obvious that this is not in the best interest of biokinds who either have suppressed their own range and rate of genetic expressions such that they are not able to do what we can, or have become dependent (some would say, addicted) to external means of interconnectivity (which, I’m finding out, is also a means of control, correction and suppression). We have in us partial DNA sequences from another life form that came to Earth 450,000 years ago; this we know with considerable certainty now. What is not known about them, is that their dependence (no, addiction) to ORME gold has contributed to a considerable densification of genetic sequences (i.e., the need to artificially induce the re-growth and slowed shortening of telomeres between genes [a kind of biological clock to our cells] to induce a kind of artificially supported longevity, which we are now trying to copy for ourselves). We do not yet realize that this is possible by means open to what our children today are capable of doing, which is to set up induction protocols that lead to the same results without dependence on any external technology or substance.
Thus, then, we are and have become objects of intense interest on the part of off-world groups here and in our solar system. We’ve been even told some of these groups have technologies capable of minimizing the gravitational and electromagnetic interaction effects between Earth and Nibiru, when the latter is in our solar system. This raises another concern in us, namely, that if that is indeed possible, the withholding of said means indicates a less than beneficent intent on the part of TTP participant groups, or that technologies the likes of HAARP (with its induction of a an electromagnetic “heating up” of the upper atmosphere) is not enough (which we have known for some time now).
And this raises a third, unasked, question that we must deal with now, at this stage of the game:
What Must We Do Now In Our Own Defense?
Again, answering this questions will be a task of layering ideas into a bootstrapping set of protocol that can presumably help us overcome the challenges we face with Nibiru, those presented to us by the presence of ET groups in TTPs with “official” groups on Earth, and those presented to us by HAVs (hostile alien visitors), to whom we are less than cattle and more like a genetic pool they can tap at will with complete impunity.
First, we must recognize plainly what we are, who we are, and what we have that we can use in our own defense. It must be clearly understood by us (as it is similarly understood by all off-world groups today) that each biokind is responsible for the evolution, upkeep/maintenance and defense of its own biology. It is time we assumed such a stance as well.
In this last section, let me draw and paint on a limited canvass, because I don’t yet want to fully disclose what all is involved in a proposed campaign yet under argumentation and intense discussion by colleagues of mine, including myself. But let me point out two powerful elements (one internal to us, the other external) which are elemental aspects to any campaign of self-defense of our biology and our planet. Let me also say up front that both of these elemental aspects are neither fully understood and sometime openly rejected by standard science and scientists, nor acceptable even as “scientific.” Yet, the working model of a physics of life we’ve been generating points out not only to the modeling validity of the processes involved but also to the engineering reliability of the uses implied therein.
The first phenomenon is what we’ve come to call the 3 percent protocol. (By the way, this is something no one wants us to know or connect the dots about!) This is the recognition that when 3 percent of the population of a given life form (monkeys, fireflies, rats, dogs, cats) acquires and manifests a new behavior, the remainder acquires and expresses same as if by magic, regardless of distance or generational lineage. The second phenomenon, an external one to us yet actually an entraining one of us all, is the existence of seven centers of resonant harmonic entrainment located in all continents. We know now the location of four of them, and working at locating the remainder. We have a fairly clear notion of how they work, and what our part is, in the process that entrains us human beings.
Much of this was already known to us in the early 90s, several years before Jamisson Neruda let the cat out of the bag to a journalist named Sara. Moreover, as a linguist, Neruda’s direct contributions to the present effort have not extended beyond his initial exposition of the matter in his interviews with Sara and through the website subsequently set up to publicize the findings.
We have controlled experimental, and field quasi-experimental evidence that the 3 percent protocol leads to very interesting physical manifestations, material and phenomenological simultaneously. For instance, in the 01-02 winter in the Chicago area, an experimental protocol used by a group of shamans instructed on how to intervene upon weather systems led to the absence of snow in Chicagoland from the early part of November 01 through the middle of February 02 — well within the period of applications of these protocols by the group. The result was no snow whatsoever in the area – the object and intent of the applications.
Another example was the presence of 3 percent effects upon the manifestation of another phenomenon by children, ages 8 to 11, in an experimental set up conducted in 03 by colleagues of mine using a protocol I had developed in 02. The result was that when 3 of the 10 participating children produced the targeted effect desired, the remainder began and did produce the same targeted effects within days. This experiment was conducted by two members of my group, and proprietary video evidence exists of the targeted effects being performed by the children. I won’t go into what the targeted effects were; suffice it to say that it definitely fell within what the Chinese refer to as extended human functions, and in fact it was a replication of an experiment done in China in the mid-90s.
How do these phenomena help us as a biokind? Well, to understand how, we must place it within the overarching notion of a HumanOrg – that is to say, the sum total of biominds on the planet. Three percent of it would place the numbers at approximately 193 million souls. To get to this, we are presently quietly working with organizations on the net from all over the world to see if a field experiment specifically focusing protocol effects on something measurable can be seriously considered, carried out and studied. These, my fellow human beings, are but a few of the things I’ve dedicated my retirement life to.
This latter endeavor is fully designed to help us all to train ourselves to use our combined vector-intentions for things that matter and that do produce results – a kind of gigantic, serial “prayer effect” experiments, if you will. The applications of such a coherent expression of vector-intention deployment skill are myriad, and their projected effects nothing short of astounding, if we are to trust the predictions of our working model. But we are yet years away from anything like that.
Well, this has been my 5-cents’ worth, for whatever it is worth to you. At least you’ll know that there are people that care about us all, not that you don’t, Brad, because I know you do. I’m referring to the use of scientific knowledge for more than just weaponizing things for someone else’s benefit and in detriment of humankind. As a Johnny-come-lately off-world contact remarked to two of us once, a year or so ago, “you need to learn to speak as one, know yourself, and exert your will as one.” Well, we’re trying desperately to learn how to do just that…
In high regard of you, and yours, I remain
Your brother in the journey.
A. R. Bordon