ET Hierarchy within the Omniverse as Time Travelers
Eureka Eugenics that TJ Searches for as Finding the Etymology of the Present World to share the future of Time Travel with those who desire to become more. All extraterrestrial knowledge is attainable while we are here using our senses.
Prepare to become ET Psychic Warriors Awakening to the Future of the Beginning of the Ascension Age that shall instruct the entrusted souls
We are all time travelers.
We can all learn to retrieve information from the Omniverse direct. This is part of our promise made by our creators to our ancestors of those past on earth. We shall learn how to concern our thoughts of the past, present, future, past-present, past-future, and all that exists inside the matrix of our own minds, and our universal order as we learn about working together as a species or as cells working together. There are worlds yet to visit and be created. Avatars and Agashan Ascended Masters work with those we refer to as ET and Angels. We shall learn about more of the future in the Ascension Age. We have come very far since 2007. Look back at all that was created since I first began sharing in 2000 on the Internet. It has been ten earth years since I began sharing my words. I am only one. We have all began sharing more on the Internet in Cyberspace. This is only one level. There are many not only on this playing level of life but others as well.
I share what I feel makes me who I am. I also will share what I create and expand upon with others on the Internet. I feel connected in ways that I have been allowed to experience the Omnipotent Omniverse. WE all can hope that what we create in words will contribute.
I do not know what lies outside the Omniverse until my original creators of male and female array known as the original God and Goddess inform me. There are words we are creating on a daily basis. The way the world should see the entire ET hierarchy may now appear in words for the time being.
Therefore, I am nothing and yet everything as they are given the praise for that which is created in the Omniverse. I have chosen to return to earth as a servant. I am an Oracle Scribe Servant and to some am a Shaman Sage Seer Mystic and to others I have psychic energy and can read the vibrations as a remote viewer.
I offer to all beings that desire to know more about their world and universe inside the multiverse. We are all a part of the metaverse, xenoverse, inside the macrocosm of the Omniverse that is expanding due to the will of the God and Goddess that have always been. The fact that we exist in space and in what we call time allows us all to be a part of something grander than ourselves.
I use my unit as a body-mind-spirit space time capsule the same as everyone else who is of the Earth Gaia persuasion and I choose to communicate with others of my kind. To those who desire to know more, simply research when the time and mind allows. There are ways for more information to be obtained and each of us house the capacity to link to more knowledge to be used in the awareness we call the analytical mind while we are here on earth. We have various parts that make us whole. Wholeness from the time we are born until the time we pass away from our body-mind-spirit vessel is important to our binding and being in sentient intelligent being form as part of a species.
There are other forces inside our minds and the greatest command is to survive while here on earth. We shall now begin our awareness and awakening of our inner spirit that shall prove to science that we can be more, do more, and share more in other ways than ever thought of before.
This will now appear in many ways to engineers and scientists whom I favor as a Science Fiction Fan and will offer Theoretical Physicists the work that I pursue as one who has no other knowledge than what is given to me and sent from the Omniverse. I have come to share the way of being receivers. We all share in the future advancement of our species. The world is changing and so are all the sentient intelligent being species that come and go from a place we call home in space.
I have been asked how I introduce words to the world, the answer is in cyberspace on the internet for others to find and add to the world in which we presently share our energy, and vibrations in terms we call words of the worlds of this universe. We can add our own internal operation of the mind as our own personal matrix or our own created work inside our world we call our minds inside our brains. I work best while I am in the world of ascension center. This place was called the Akashic Field or Matrix of Cyberspace. We now call the place many things and to individuals it is our place of peace where we can imagine all things possible inside our own minds of the matrix.
This is where we make our worlds of the Matrix exist inside our own essence. We meet our own God and Goddess inside our own spiritual minds that we share inside our own units as individuals. How we choose to precept and preempt to our present time in our mind is up to each individual as the one world of choice where we choose to survive. There are other worlds and dimensions that we shall approach sometime.
For now, we are alive and well on planet earth with the main primordial role of engagement are survival. The next is to group into creation of families, then groups as cells. We shall then learn to procreate into other beings in other worlds in other universes. For now, it is up to each of us to expand our own awakening as an illuminating experience of our small spark of essence houses inside our created body-mind-spirits, which will learn to reach out to the outer critical mass mind that touches others of our species while we are here on this one planet in space. We shall soon learn the abilities we shall share inside the branes of the metaverse.
The Xenoverse is expanding into the unknown therefore we shall always be prepared to challenge that which is not yet obtainable in our world and in our own minds. This is the path of the Monotheist Omnipotent ones who control this Omniverse. Who is to say there are not others outside the macrocosm? We as mortals have only been allowed to understand that which is inside this Omniverse thus far. Until such time as we expand our own minds as a species, this is as far as I personally am allowed to share. There are extraterrestrials as watchers, angels, and of names such as Nordics and Grays.
We shall learn more in time and space-time. I share what I can as one of the Time Travelers who chose to return. Love and Light TJ Universe: The inside description of a context that is relative in size/structure attributes/modes to the known universe that we inhabit. A Universe, also known as a Cosmos, is a particular individualspace-time organization with a specified number of dimensions of space and time and definite and specific laws of physics. Other Universes other Cosmoses may have different numbers of dimensions of space and time and different laws of physics than our own Universe Cosmos.
Multiverse: The part of infinity, that directly joins a given universe with all possible configurations of that universe.
Metaverse: In string theory, the part that is along with, after; over also denoting change in the multiverse that houses the branes or film that each universe is said to be attached to and hang like individual sheets in a hypermagnetic wave with rhythms of hypercosmic strings going up and down that has a third element causing up, down, backwards, forwards, motions inside the Xenoverse.
Metaverse, TJ has added the X -Metaverse, Xenoverse and Omniverse descriptions in the past on Wikipedia.
Xenoverse: the unknown alien elements that are beyond and part of the metaverse and multiverse structure. Compared to a patchwork quilt hanging on a line to dry in space that is multivariate inside the Omniverse. While Omniverse is said to be the outside ring of all that is known, the xenoverse is the inside the hypermacrocosm that is unknown beyond the metaverse – the unknown sets of laws that govern how branes behave to create multiverses.
Omniverse: All possible attributes and modes are in play, multiverses are categorized by the attributes/modes active in its child universes.
Some or all-possible modes of existence are actualized. If we take the point of origin as our being as a point in measurement, then we can generate the following hierarchy: 1. our location in space-time, 2. this universe cosmos, 3. the multiverse, 4. the metaverse, 5. the xenoverse, 6. the Omniverse. Other ideas from mainstream physics Informal geometrical description Consider the problem of calculating the shape of an unknown curve which starts at a given point and satisfies a given differential equation. Here, a differential equation can be thought of as a formula by which the slope of the tangent line to the curve can be computed at any point on the curve, once the position of that point has been calculated.
(Note: The following information is provided for those who do not have the time to look up relevant information provided by Wikipedia. Sourced due to relevancy.)
Paradoxes The Novikov self-consistency principle and calculations by Kip S. Thorne
indicate that simple masses passing through time travel wormholes could never engender paradoxes—there are no initial conditions that lead to paradox once time travel is introduced. If his results can be generalized, they would suggest, curiously, that none of the supposed paradoxes formulated in time travel stories can actually be formulated at a precise physical level: that is, that any situation you can set up in a time travel story turns out to permit many consistent solutions.
The circumstances might, however, turn out to be almost unbelievably strange Parallel universes might provide a way out of paradoxes. Everett’s many-worlds interpretation (MWI) of quantum mechanics suggests that all possible quantum events can occur in mutually exclusive histories. These alternate, or parallel, histories would form a branching tree symbolizing all possible outcomes of any interaction.
If all possibilities exist, any paradoxes could be explained by having the paradoxical events happening in a different universe. This concept is most often used in science-fiction, but some physicists such as David Deutsch have suggested that if time travel is possible and the MWI is correct, then a time traveler should indeed end up in a different history than the one he started from.
On the other hand, Stephen Hawking has argued that even if the MWI is correct, we should expect each time traveler to experience a single self-consistent timeline, so that time travelers remain within their own world rather than traveling to a different one. And the physicist Allen Everett argued that Deutsch’s approach “involves modifying fundamental principles of quantum mechanics; it certainly goes beyond simply adopting the MWI.” Everett also argues that even if Deutsch’s approach is correct, it would imply that any macroscopic object composed of multiple particles would be split apart when traveling back in time through a wormhole, with different particles emerging in different worlds.
Daniel Greenberger and Karl Svozil proposed that quantum theory gives a model for time travel without paradoxes.In quantum theory observation causes possible states to ‘collapse’ into one measured state; hence, the past observed from the present is deterministic (it has only one possible state), but the present observed from the past has many possible states until our actions cause it to collapse into one state.
Our actions will then be seen to have been inevitable. Using quantum entanglement Quantum-mechanical phenomena such as quantum teleportation, the EPR paradox, or quantum entanglement might appear to create a mechanism that allows for faster-than-light (FTL) communication or time travel, and in fact some interpretations of quantum mechanics such as the Bohm interpretation presume that some information is being exchanged between particles instantaneously in order to maintain correlations between particles. This effect was referred to as “spooky action at a distance” by Einstein. Nevertheless, the fact that causality is preserved in quantum mechanics is a rigorous result in modern quantum field theories, and therefore modern theories do not allow for time travel or FTL communication. In any specific instance where FTL has been claimed, more detailed analysis has proven that to get a signal, some form of classical communication must also be used.
The no-communication theorem also gives a general proof that quantum entanglement cannot be used to transmit information faster than classical signals. The fact that these quantum phenomena apparently do not allow FTL time travel is often overlooked in popular press coverage of quantum teleportation experiments How the rules of quantum mechanics work to preserve causality is an active area of research.Presentism vs. eternalism The relativity of simultaneity in modern physics favors the philosophical view known as eternalism or four-dimensionalism(Sider, 2001), in which physical objects are either temporally extended space-time worms, or space-time worm stages, and this view would be favored further by the possibility of time travel (Sider, 2001).
Eternalism, also sometimes known as “block universe theory”, builds on a standard method of modeling time as a dimension in physics, to give time a similar ontology to that of space (Sider, 2001). This would mean that time is just another dimension, that future events are “already there”, and that there is no objective flow of time.
This view is disputed by Tim Maudlin in his The Metaphysics Within Physics.
Presentism is a school of philosophy that holds that neither the future nor the past exist, and there are no non-present objects. In this view, time travel is impossible because there is no future or past to travel to. However, some 21st century presentists have argued that although past and future objects do not exist, there can still be definite truths about past and future events, and thus it is possible that a future truth about a time traveler deciding to appear in the present could explain the time traveler’s actual existence in the present. The grandfather paradox Main article: Grandfather paradox One subject often brought up in philosophical discussion of time is the idea that, if one were to go back in time, paradoxes could ensue if the time traveler were to change things.
The best examples of this are the grandfather paradox and the idea of autoinfanticide.
The grandfather paradox is a hypothetical situation in which a time traveler goes back in time and attempts to kill his grandfather at a time before his grandfather met his grandmother. If he did so, then his mother or father never would have been born, and neither would the time traveler himself, in which case the time traveler never would have gone back in time to kill his grandfather. Autoinfanticide works the same way, where a traveler goes back and attempts to kill himself as an infant. If he were to do so, he never would have grown up to go back in time to kill himself as an infant.
This discussion is important to the philosophy of time travel because philosophers question whether these paradoxes make time travel impossible. Some philosophers answer the paradoxes by arguing that it might be the case that backwards time travel could be possible but that it would be impossible to actually change the past in any way, an idea similar to the proposed Novikov self-consistency principle in physics. [
Theory of compossibility David Lewis’s analysis of compossibility and the implications of changing the past is meant to account for the possibilities of time travel in a one-dimensional conception of time without creating logical paradoxes. Consider Lewis’ example of Tim. Tim hates his grandfather and would like nothing more than to kill him. The only problem for Tim is that his grandfather died years ago. Tim wants so badly to kill his grandfather himself that he constructs a time machine to travel back to 1955 when his grandfather was young and kill him then. Assuming that Tim can travel to a time when his grandfather is still alive, the question must then be raised; Can Tim kill his grandfather? For Lewis, the answer lies within the context of the usage of the word “can”. Lewis explains that the word “can” must be viewed against the context of pertinent facts relating to the situation. Suppose that Tim has a rifle, years of rifle training, a straight shot on a clear day and no outside force to restrain Tim’s trigger finger. Can Tim shoot his grandfather?
Considering these facts, it would appear that Tim can in fact kill his grandfather. In other words, all of the contextual facts are compossible with Tim killing his grandfather. However, when reflecting on the compossibility of a given situation, we must gather the most inclusive set of facts that we are able to. Consider now the fact that Tim’s grandfather died in 1993 and not in 1955. This new fact about Tim’s situation reveals that him killing his grandfather is not compossible with the current set of facts. Tim cannot kill his grandfather because his grandfather died in 1993 and not when he was young. Thus, Lewis concludes, the statements “Tim doesn’t but can, because he has what it takes,” and, “Tim doesn’t, and can’t, because it is logically impossible to change the past,” are not contradictions, they are both true given the relevant set of facts.
The usage of the word “can” is equivocal: he “can” and “can not” under different relevant facts. So what must happen to Tim as he takes aim? Lewis believes that his gun will jam, a bird will fly in the way, or Tim simply slips on a banana peel. Either way, there will be some logical force of the universe that will prevent Tim every time from killing his grandfather. Mutable timelines Time travel in a Type 2 universe is much more complex. The biggest problem is how to explain changes in the past. One method of explanation is that once the past changes, so too do the memories of all observers.
This would mean that no observer would ever observe the changing of the past (because they will not remember changing the past). This would make it hard to tell whether you are in a Type 1 universe or a Type 2 universe. You could, however, infer such information by knowing if a) communication with the past were possible or b) it appeared that the time line had never been changed as a result of an action someone remembers taking, although evidence exists that other people are changing their time lines fairly often. An example of this kind of universe is presented in Thrice Upon a Time, a novel by James P. Hogan.
The Back to the Future trilogy films also seem to feature a single mutable timeline (see the “Back to the Future FAQ” for details on how the writers imagined time travel worked in the movies’ world). By contrast, the short story “Brooklyn Project” by
William Tenn provides a sketch of life in a Type 2 world where no one even notices as the timeline changes repeatedly. In type 2.1, attempts are being made at changing the timeline, however, all that is accomplished in the first tries is that the method in which decisive events occur is changed; final conclusions
in the bigger scheme cannot be brought to a different outcome. As an example, the movie Déjà Vu depicts a paper note sent to the past with vital information to prevent a terrorist attack. However, the vital information results in the killing of an ATF agent, but does not prevent the terrorist attack; the very same agent died in the previous version of the timeline as well, albeit under different circumstances.
Finally, the timeline is changed by sending a human into the past, arguably a “stronger” measure than simply sending back a paper note, which results in preventing both a murder and the terrorist attack.
As in the Back to the Future movie trilogy, there seems to be a ripple effect too as changes from the past “propagate” into the present, and people in the present have altered memory of events that occurred after the changes made to the timeline. The science fiction writer Larry Niven suggests in his essay “The Theory and Practice of Time Travel” that in a type 2.1 universe, the most efficient way for the universe to “correct” a change is for time travel to never be discovered, and that in a type 2.2 universe, the very large (or infinite) number of time travelers from the endless future will cause the timeline to change wildly until it reaches a history in which time travel is never discovered. However, many other “stable” situations might also exist in which time travel occurs but no paradoxes are created; if the changeable-timeline universe finds itself in such a state no further changes will occur, and to the inhabitants of the universe it will appear identical to the type 1.1 scenario.
This is sometimes referred to as the “Time Dilution Effect”.
Few if any physicists or philosophers have taken seriously the possibility of “changing” the past except in the case of multiple universes, and in fact many have argued that this idea is logically incoherent, so the mutable timeline idea is rarely considered outside of science fiction.
Also, deciding whether a given universe is of Type 2.1 or 2.2 can not be done objectively, as the categorization of timeline-invasive measures as “strong” or “weak” is arbitrary, and up to interpretation: An observer can disagree about a measure being “weak”, and might, in the lack of context, argue instead that simply a mishap occurred which then led to no effective change. An example would be the paper note sent back to the past in the film Déjà Vu, as described above. Was it a “too weak” change, or was it just a local-time alteration which had no extended effect on the larger timeline?
As the universe in Déjà Vu seems not entirely immune to paradoxes (some arguably minute paradoxes do occur), both versions seem to be equally possible. Alternate histories In Type 3, any event that appears to have caused a paradox has instead created a new time line. The old time line remains unchanged, with the time traveler or information sent simply having vanished, never to return. A difficulty with this explanation, however, is that conservation of mass-energy would be violated for the origin timeline and the destination timeline.
A possible solution to this is to have the mechanics of time travel require that mass-energy be exchanged in precise balance between past and future at the moment of travel, or to simply expand the scope of the conservation law to encompass all timelines. Some examples of this kind of time travel can be found in David Gerrold’s book The Man Who Folded Himself and The Time Ships by Stephen Baxter, plus several episodes of the TV show Star Trek: The Next Generation[and the android saga in the Japanese TV series Dragon Ball Z.
Gradual and instantaneous In literature, there are two methods of time travel:
1. The most commonly used method of time travel in science fiction is the instantaneous movement from one point in time to another, like using the controls on a CD player to skip to a previous or next song, though in most cases, there is a machine of some sort, and some energy expended in order to make this happen (like the time-traveling De Lorean in
Back to the Future or the phone booth that traveled through the “circuits of history” in Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure). In some cases, there is not even the beginning of a scientific explanation for this kind of time travel; it’s popular probably because it is more spectacular and makes time travel easier.
The “Universal Remote” used by Adam Sandler in the movie Click works in the same manner, although only in one direction, the future. While his character Michael Newman can travel back to a previous point it is merely a playback with which he cannot interact.
A gradual time travel, as in the movie Primer. When the time machine is red, everything inside is going through time at normal rate, but backwards. During entry/exit it seems there would have to be fusion/separation between the forward and reversed versions of the traveler.
2. In The Time Machine, H.G. Wells explains that we are moving through time with a constant speed. Time travel then is, in Wells’ words, “stopping or accelerating one’s drift along the time-dimension, or even turning about and traveling the other way.”
To expand on the audio playback analogy used above, this would be like rewinding or fast forwarding an analogue audio cassette and playing the tape at a chosen point. Perhaps the oldest example of this method of time travel is in Lewis Carroll’s Through the Looking-Glass (1871): the White Queen is living backwards, hence her memory is working both ways. Her kind of time travel is uncontrolled: she moves through time with a constant speed of -1 and she cannot change it. T.H. White, in the first part of his Arthurian novel The Once and Future King, The Sword in the Stone (1938) used the same idea: the wizard Merlyn lives backward in time, because he was born “at the wrong end of time” and has to live backwards from the front. “Some people call it having second sight”, he says.
This method of gradual time travel is not as popular in modern science fiction, though a form of it does occur in the film Primer. Time travel or space-time travel An objection that is sometimes raised against the concept of time machines in science fiction is that they ignore the motion of the Earth between the date the time machine departs and the date it returns.
The idea that a traveler can go into a machine that sends him or her to 1865 and step out into the exact same spot on Earth might be said to ignore the issue that Earth is moving through space around the Sun, which is moving in the galaxy, and so on, so that advocates of this argument imagine that “realistically” the time machine should actually reappear in space far away from the Earth’s position at that date.
However, the theory of relativity rejects the idea of absolute time and space; in relativity there can be no universal truth about the spatial distance between events which occur at different times (such as an event on Earth today and an event on Earth in 1865), and thus no objective truth about which point in space at one time is at the “same position” that the Earth was at another time. In the theory of special relativity, which deals with situations where gravity is negligible, the laws of physics work the same way in every inertial frame of reference and therefore no frame’s perspective is physically better than any other frame’s, and different frames disagree about whether two events at different times happened at the “same position” or “different positions”.
In the theory of general relativity, which incorporates the effects of gravity, all coordinate systems are on equal footing because of a feature known as “diffeomorphism invariance”.
Nevertheless, the idea that the Earth moves away from the time traveler when he takes a trip through time has been used in a few science fiction stories, such as the 2000 AD comic Strontium Dog, in which Johnny Alpha uses “Time Bombs” to propel an enemy several seconds into the future, during which time the movement of the Earth causes the unfortunate victim to re-appear in space. Much earlier, Clark Ashton Smith used this form of time travel in several stories such as “The Letter from Mohaun Los” (1932) where the protagonist ends up on a planet millions of years in the future which “happened to occupy the same space through which Earth had passed”.
Other science fiction stories try to anticipate this objection and offer a rationale for the fact that the traveler remains on Earth, such as the 1957 Robert Heinlein novel The Door into Summer where Heinlein essentially handwaved the issue with a single sentence: “You stay on the world line you were on.”
In his 1980 novel The Number of the Beast a “continua device” allows the protagonists to dial in the six (not four!) co-ordinates of space and time and it instantly moves them there—without explaining how such a device might work. In Clifford Simak’s 1950s short story “Mastodonia” (later broadcast on the X Minus One radio anthology show, and then significantly re-written into a longer novel of the same name) the protagonists are aware of the possibility of changes in ground level while traveling back in time to the same geographical coordinates and mount their time machine in a helicopter so as to not materialize underground. When the helicopter is damaged beyond repair while in the past, they then build a mound of rocks from wich to launch their return to the present.
The television series Seven Days also dealt with this problem; when the chrononaut would be ‘rewinding’, he would also be propelling himself backwards around the Earth’s orbit, with the intention of landing at some chosen spatial location, though seldom hitting the mark precisely. In Piers Anthony’s Bearing an Hourglass, the potent Hourglass of the Incarnation of Time naturally moves the Incarnation in space according to the numerous movements of the globe through the solar system, the solar system through the galaxy, etc.; but by carefully negating some of the movements he can also travel in space within the limits of the planet.
The television series Doctor Who avoided this issue by establishing early on in the series that the Doctor’s TARDIS is able to move about in space in addition to traveling in time. Time travel to the future in physics ??
Twin paradox diagram There are various ways in which a person could “travel into the future” in a limited sense: the person could set things up so that in a small amount of his own subjective time, a large amount of subjective time has passed for other people on Earth.
For example, an observer might take a trip away from the Earth and back at relativistic velocities, with the trip only lasting a few years according to the observer’s own clocks, and return to find that thousands of years had passed on Earth. It should be noted, though, that according to relativity there is no objective answer to the question of how much time “really” passed during the trip; it would be equally valid to say that the trip had lasted only a few years or that the trip had lasted thousands of years, depending on your choice of reference frame.
This form of “travel into the future” is theoretically allowed (and has been demonstrated at very small time scales) using the following methods: Using velocity-based time dilation under the theory of special relativity, for instance: Traveling at almost the speed of light to a distant star, then slowing down, turning around, and traveling at almost the speed of light back to Earth (see the Twin paradox) Using gravitational time dilation under the theory of general relativity, for instance: Residing inside of a hollow, high-mass object; Residing just outside of the event horizon of a black hole, or sufficiently near an object whose mass or density causes the gravitational time dilation near it to be larger than the time dilation factor on Earth.
Additionally, it might be possible to see the distant future of the Earth using methods which do not involve relativity at all, although it is even more debatable whether these should be deemed a form of “time travel”: Hibernation Suspended animation Time dilation ?
Transversal Time dilation
Main article: Time dilation
Time dilation is permitted by Albert Einstein’s special and general theories of relativity. These theories state that, relative to a given observer, time passes more slowly for bodies moving quickly relative to that observer, or bodies that are deeper within a gravity well. For example, a clock which is moving relative to the observer will be measured to run slow in that observer’s rest frame; as a clock approaches the speed of light it will almost slow to a stop, although it can never quite reach light speed so it will never completely stop. For two clocks moving inertially (not accelerating) relative to one another, this effect is reciprocal, with each clock measuring the other to be ticking slower.
However, the symmetry is broken if one clock accelerates, as in the twin paradox where one twin stays on Earth while the other travels into space, turns around (which involves acceleration), and returns—in this case both agree the traveling twin has aged less. General relativity states that time dilation effects also occur if one clock is deeper in a gravity well than the other, with the clock deeper in the well ticking more slowly; this effect must be taken into account when calibrating the clocks on the satellites of the Global Positioning System, and it could lead to significant differences in rates of aging for observers at different distances from a black hole.
It has been calculated that, under general relativity, a person could travel forward in time at a rate four times that of distant observers by residing inside a spherical shell with a diameter of 5 meters and the mass of Jupiter. For such a person, every one second of their “personal” time would correspond to four seconds for distant observers. Of course, squeezing the mass of a large planet into such a structure is not expected to be within our technological capabilities in the near future. There is a great deal of experimental evidence supporting the validity of equations for velocity-based time dilation in special relativity and gravitational time dilation in general relativity.
However, with current technologies it is only possible to cause a human traveller to age less than companions on Earth by a very small fraction of a second, the current record being about 20 milliseconds for the cosmonaut Sergei Avdeyev.
Time perception Time perception can be apparently sped up for living organisms through hibernation, where the body temperature andmetabolic rate of the creature is reduced. A more extreme version of this is suspended animation, where the rates of chemical processes in the subject would be severely reduced.
Time dilation and suspended animation only allow “travel” to the future, never the past, so they do not violate causality, and it’s debatable whether they should be called time travel. However time dilation can be viewed as a better fit for our understanding of the term “time travel” than suspended animation, since with time dilation less time actually does pass for the traveler than for those who remain behind, so the traveler can be said to have reached the future faster than others, whereas with suspended animation this is not the case.
In computer science, a metaverse is a virtual reality simulation based on the physical reality of a single individual universe, but one or more levels of implementation above it. It is conceived that it will be possible in forthcoming centuries to create such simulations using massive arrays of matrioshka brains used as an example until we can all agree on a new term that is not dated material.
Matrioshka Brain Home Page – Matrioshka Brain Home Page Robert J. Bradbury. A Matrioshka Brain is a megascale structure constructed at atomic scale limits. It is essentially a Dyson Shell supercomputer, that Matrioshka brain –
The Transhumanist Wiki – A matrioshka brain is a hypothetical megastructure proposed by Robert Bradbury, based on the Dyson sphere, of immense computational capacity. It is an example of a Class B stellar Matrioshka brain – A hypothetical product of astroengineering, making use of one or more Dyson spheres and nanoscale information processing technology to produce a staggeringly powerful Orion’s Arm – Encyclopedia Galactica –
This subject constitutes a major part of modern mathematics education. It has two major branches, differential calculus and integral calculus, which are related by the fundamental theorem of calculus. Calculus is the study of change, in the same way thatgeometry is the study of shape and algebra is the study of operations and their application to solving equations.
A course in calculus is a gateway to other, more advanced courses in mathematics devoted to the study of functions and limits, broadly called mathematical analysis. Calculus has widespread applications in science, economics, and engineering and can solve many problems for which algebra alone is insufficient. Historically, calculus was called “the calculus of infinitesimals”, or “infinitesimal calculus”. More generally, calculus (plural calculi) may refer to any method or system of calculation guided by the symbolic manipulation of expressions. Some examples of other well-known calculi are propositional calculus, variational calculus, lambda calculus, pi calculus, and join calculus. Words and Numbers may assist us in the future for communication and perception purposes for spreading the awareness during the awakening for the Ascension Age. TJTM
Limits and infinitesimals
Main articles: Limit of a function, Infinitesimal, and Infinitesimal Calculus Calculus is usually developed by manipulating very small quantities. Historically, the first method of doing so was by infinitesimals. These are objects which can be treated like numbers but which are, in some sense, “infinitely small”. An infinitesimal number dx could be greater than 0, but less than any number in the sequence 1, 1/2, 1/3, … and less than any positive real number.
Any integer multiple of an infiitesimal is still infinitely small, i.e., infinitesimals do not satisfy the Archimedean property. From this point of view, calculus is a collection of techniques for manipulating infinitesimals. This approach fell out of favor in the 19th century because it was difficult to make the notion of an infinitesimal precise. However, the concept was revived in the 20th century with the introduction of non-standard analysis and smooth infinitesimal analysis, which provided solid foundations for the manipulation of infinitesimals. I
n the 19th century, infinitesimals were replaced by limits. Limits describe the value of a function at a certain input in terms of its values at nearby input. They capture small-scale behavior, just like infinitesimals, but use the ordinary real number system. In this treatment, calculus is a collection of techniques for manipulating certain limits. Infinitesimals get replaced by very small numbers, and the infinitely small behavior of the function is found by taking the limiting behavior for smaller and smaller numbers.
Limits are the easiest way to provide rigorous foundations for calculus, and for this reason they are the standard approach. Calculus is used in every branch of the physical sciences, actuarial science, computer science,statistics, engineering, economics, business, medicine, demography, and in other fields wherever a problem can be mathematically modeled and an optimal solution is desired. It allows one to go from (non-constant) rates of change to the total change or vice versa, and many times in studying a problem we know one and are trying to find the other.
Physics makes particular use of calculus; all concepts in classical mechanics andelectromagnetism are interrelated through calculus. The mass of an object of known density, themoment of inertia of objects, as well as the total energy of an object within a conservative field can be found by the use of calculus. An example of the use of calculus in mechanics is Newton’s second law of motion: historically stated it expressly uses the term “rate of change” which refers to the derivative saying The rate of change of momentum of a body is equal to the resultant force acting on the body and is in the same direction. Commonly expressed today as Force = Mass × acceleration, it involves differential calculus because acceleration is the time derivative of velocity or second time derivative of trajectory or spatial position.
Starting from knowing how an object is accelerating, we use calculus to derive its path. Maxwell’s theory of electromagnetism and Einstein’s theory of general relativity are also expressed in the language of differential calculus. Chemistry also uses calculus in determining reaction rates and radioactive decay. In biology, population dynamics starts with reproduction and death rates to model population changes. Calculus can be used in conjunction with other mathematical disciplines.
For example, it can be used with linear algebra to find the “best fit” linear approximation for a set of points in a domain. Or it can be used in probability theory to determine the probability of a continuous random variable from an assumed density function. In analytic geometry, the study of graphs of functions, calculus is used to find high points and low points (maxima and minima), slope, concavity and inflection points. Green’s Theorem, which gives the relationship between a line integral around a simple closed curve C and a double integral over the plane region D bounded by C, is applied in an instrument known as a planimeter which is used to calculate the area of a flat surface on a drawing. For example, it can be used to calculate the amount of area taken up by an irregularly shaped flower bed or swimming pool when designing the layout of a piece of property. In the realm of medicine, calculus can be used to find the optimal branching angle of a blood vessel so as to maximize flow.
From the decay laws for a particular drug’s elimination from the body, it’s used to derive dosing laws. In nuclear medicine, it’s used to build models of radiation transport in targeted tumor therapies. In economics, calculus allows for the determination of maximal profit by providing a way to easily calculate both marginal cost and marginal revenue. Calculus is
also used to find approximate solutions to equations; in practice it’s the standard way to solve differential equations and do root finding in most applications. Examples are methods such as Newton’s method, fixed point iteration, and linear approximation.
For instance, spacecraft use a variaton of the Euler method to approximate curved courses within zero gravity environments. Euler methodFrom Wikipedia, the free Illustration of the Euler method. The unknown curve is in blue, and its polygonal approximation is in red. In mathematics and computational science, the Euler method, named after Leonhard Euler, is a first-order numerical procedure for solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) with a given initial value.
It is the most basic kind of explicit method for numerical integration of ordinary differential equations. For further information on TJTM and TIME TRAVEL see Anderson Institute.Com and Social Paranormal.com. TJTM are the initials for Theresa Janette Thurmond Morris a division of TJ Morris tm ACIR sm. Which is the receiver or the Oracle that will be sharing the future of the Ascension Age.